Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies01:22

Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

631
Additional therapies for treating patients with heart failure (HF) may include procedural interventions, supplemental oxygen, the management of sleep disorders, and nutritional therapy.Procedural InterventionsImplantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: For patients at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias due to severe left ventricular dysfunction, an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) can detect and terminate these arrhythmias, preventing sudden cardiac death and improving survival rates.
631
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care01:29

Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

753
Managing cardiomyopathy involves addressing underlying or precipitating causes, treating heart failure with medications, and implementing dietary changes and a balanced exercise and rest regimen.Lifestyle ModificationsCardiomyopathy patients should adopt a low-sodium diet to reduce fluid retention and manage heart failure. A personalized exercise and rest plan helps maintain physical fitness without overstraining the heart. Avoiding alcohol and tobacco is essential to prevent further damage to...
753

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rationale for and design of the REsolution of LEft VENTricular thrombus (RELEVENT) Trial.

American heart journal·2025
Same author

Randomised controlled trial of standard outpatient cardiac rehabilitation versus personalised cardiac rehabilitation for secondary prevention for all in need (SPAN) after type 1 myocardial infarction.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Novel CAC Dispersion and Density Score to Predict Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Mortality.

Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging·2025
Same author

Validation of physiological principles of Non-Invasive fractional flow reserve derived from CT coronary angiography.

Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography·2025
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of the transition from conventional to high-sensitivity troponin assay for the investigation and management of suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department.

American heart journal·2025
Same author

Triglyceride to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio as a Marker of Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis and Hepatic Steatosis in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
06:13

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump

Published on: February 5, 2021

27.2K

Intra-aortic balloon pump: indications, efficacy, guidelines and future directions.

Abdul R Ihdayhid1, Sandeep Chopra, Jamie Rankin

  • 1Cardiology Department, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Current Opinion in Cardiology
|May 23, 2014
PubMed
Summary

The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is safe but lacks proven efficacy for acute myocardial infarction (MI) and high-risk procedures. Further research is needed to define its role in specific patient groups.

More Related Videos

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
06:10

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: June 12, 2021

2.8K
Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
07:39

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: August 16, 2021

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
06:13

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump

Published on: February 5, 2021

27.2K
Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
06:10

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: June 12, 2021

2.8K
Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
07:39

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: August 16, 2021

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Medical Device Efficacy

Background:

  • The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been a cardiac assist device since 1968, primarily based on physiological principles and observational data.
  • Limited randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have historically constrained understanding of IABP's clinical effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent randomized data on the efficacy and safety of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP).
  • To evaluate IABP's role in acute myocardial infarction (MI), high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses.
  • Review of observational data for specific indications where RCTs are lacking.

Main Results:

  • Recent RCTs and meta-analyses confirm the safety of IABP but question its efficacy in acute MI, with or without cardiogenic shock.
  • Limited support exists for IABP's efficacy in high-risk PCI and CABG, with only observational data for niche indications like mechanical MI complications and refractory ventricular arrhythmia.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence supports IABP safety but provides limited or no support for its efficacy in high-risk MI, cardiogenic shock, or prophylactic use in high-risk PCI/CABG.
  • Further studies are essential to optimize patient selection, timing, and adjunctive therapies to define IABP's role in contemporary cardiovascular practice.