Urgent carotid duplex and head computed tomography versus ABCD2 score for risk stratification of patients with
Maddalena Ottaviani1, Simone Vanni, Federico Moroni
1Departments of aEmergency bExperimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Insights
Urgent carotid ultrasound and head CT scans improve transient ischemic attack (TIA) risk prediction beyond the ABCD score. These imaging tests should be used for all TIA patients to better assess stroke risk.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Emergency Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a critical warning sign for future ischemic stroke.
- Accurate risk stratification is essential for timely intervention in TIA patients.
- Current prognostic tools like the ABCD score have limitations in predicting stroke risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively compare the prognostic value of the ABCD score, urgent carotid ultrasound (CUS), and unenhanced head computed tomography (UHCT) in emergency department patients with TIA.
- To evaluate the added prognostic value of imaging tests to the ABCD score for predicting 30-day ischemic stroke risk.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study of consecutive adult TIA patients.
- Assessment of ABCD score, urgent CUS, and UHCT within 24 hours of presentation.
- Primary outcome: occurrence of ischemic stroke within 30 days.
Main Results:
- 186 TIA patients included; 6.5% experienced ischemic stroke within 30 days.
- Internal carotid stenosis (≥50%) on CUS was associated with a 4.5-fold increased stroke risk.
- Acute ischemic lesions on UHCT showed a trend towards increased stroke risk.
- Positive imaging tests incrementally increased stroke risk at 7 and 30 days, regardless of ABCD score (P<0.05).
Conclusions:
- Simple imaging tests, urgent CUS and UHCT, provide significant added prognostic value to the ABCD score in TIA patients.
- These imaging modalities should be routinely performed in all TIA patients presenting to the emergency department.
- Integrating imaging findings with clinical scores enhances stroke risk prediction and guides management decisions.
Objectives:
The aim of the study was to prospectively compare the prognostic value of ABCD score, urgent carotid ultrasound (CUS), and unenhanced head computed tomography (UHCT) in patients presenting to the emergency department with transient ischemic attack (TIA).
Patients And Methods:
We carried out a prospective observational study including consecutive adult patients with TIA. Each patient underwent ABCD score assessment, urgent CUS, and UHCT within 24 h from presentation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of ischemic stroke within 30 days.
Results:
We included 186 patients with a median age of 75 years and a prevalent male sex (57.5%). During follow-up, 12 ischemic strokes (6.5%) occurred, four (7.1%) in patients with ABCD score less than 4 and 8 (6.2%) in those with a score of at least 4. An internal carotid stenosis of at least 50% consistent with the neurological deficit was found in 15 patients (8.1%), and it was associated with a high risk for stroke (odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1-18.8). An acute ischemic lesion consistent with the neurological deficit was revealed by UHCT in 15 patients (8.1%), and it was associated with a trend of increasing stroke risk (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 0.5-12.5). Patients without, with at least one, or with both positive imaging tests showed incremental stroke risk at both 7 (2.5, 12.5, and 33%) and 30 days (5, 12.5, and 33%) (P<0.05 for both).
Conclusion:
Simple imaging tests showed added prognostic value to ABCD score in TIA patients. Urgent CUS together with UHCT should be performed in all TIA patients regardless of ABCD score.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation


