Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Imaging Features of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Published on: June 16, 2020
United Kingdom survey of current management of juvenile localized scleroderma
Daniel P Hawley1, Clare E Pain2, Eileen M Baildam2
1Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Department of Dermatology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, Department of Dermatology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Musculoskeletal Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, and Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. dhawley@doctors.org.uk.
Insights
Clinical practices for juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) monitoring and treatment vary significantly among UK pediatric rheumatologists and dermatologists. These inconsistencies impact clinical trials and standardized care for JLS patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Rheumatology
- Dermatology
- Rare Diseases
Background:
- Juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) is a rare autoimmune condition affecting children and young people.
- Assessing JLS severity and progression is challenging, with diverse monitoring tools available.
- Current clinical practices for JLS management in the UK are not well-standardized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utilization and perception of JLS monitoring tools by UK clinicians.
- To identify current treatment strategies for JLS.
- To describe existing transition protocols from pediatric to adult care for JLS patients.
Main Methods:
- An electronic survey was distributed to UK pediatric rheumatologists and dermatologists managing JLS.
- The survey gathered data on the use and views of 15 JLS monitoring tools.
- Respondents provided information on JLS treatments and transition services.
Main Results:
- Medical photography was the most common monitoring tool (73%).
- The modified Rodnan skin score was frequently used by 33% of pediatric rheumatologists.
- Treatment approaches varied, with dermatologists favoring topical therapies and rheumatologists using biologics and cyclophosphamide (CYC).
- Transition arrangements were reported by 43% of dermatologists and 91% of rheumatologists.
Conclusions:
- Significant variability exists in JLS monitoring tool use, treatment patterns, and transition care among UK pediatric rheumatologists and dermatologists.
- These practice variations pose challenges for multicenter clinical trials and standardization of JLS care.
- Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for JLS management.
Objectives:
Juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) is a rare condition that is often difficult to assess and for which a variety of monitoring tools have been described. We aimed to describe how monitoring tools are used and perceived by clinicians in the UK, to ascertain treatments used for JLS and to provide a description of transition arrangements to adult care.
Methods:
An e-survey of UK paediatric rheumatologists and dermatologists managing children and young people (CYP) with JLS was distributed using the national organisations representing these clinician groups. We asked respondents for their views and experience using 15 JLS monitoring tools, about transition services and about treatments used.
Results:
Thirty-five dermatologists and 13 paediatric rheumatologists responded. Paediatric rheumatologists managed more CYP with JLS than dermatologists (median 16-20 and 3, respectively). Transition arrangements were reported by 43% of dermatologists and 91% of paediatric rheumatologists. Medical photography was the most frequently regularly used monitoring tool (73% respondents). The modified Rodnan skin score was the skin score used most commonly: 33% of paediatric rheumatologists and 3% of dermatologists reported using this tool frequently. Topical treatments and ultraviolet light were used by 49-80% of dermatologists and 0-8% paediatric rheumatologists. Biologic drugs and CYC were used by 0-3% of dermatologists and 31-46% of paediatric rheumatologists.
Conclusion:
How monitoring tools are accessed, used and perceived by paediatric rheumatologists and dermatologists in the UK varies between and within clinician groups, as do treatment prescribing patterns and transition arrangements. These differences will impact on the feasibility of conducting multicentre clinical trials and on standardising clinical care.
Related Concept Videos
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

