Inter-rater agreement in the evaluation of abdominal radiographs for necrotizing enterocolitis

Sherif El-Kady1, Dara Petel1, Robert Baird1

  • 1Department of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal Quebec, Canada; McGill University, Montreal Quebec, Canada; Department of Radiology, The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal Quebec, Canada.

Insights

Inter-rater agreement for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) diagnosis on abdominal radiographs varied among specialists. Radiologists showed excellent agreement, while agreement between surgeons and radiologists was only moderate, highlighting communication needs.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal imaging
  • Pediatric radiology
  • Surgical diagnostics

Background:

  • Abdominal radiographs are crucial for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) surveillance in premature infants.
  • Established findings exist, but inter-observer variability in interpretation is not well-studied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the inter-rater agreement among radiologists and pediatric surgeons in interpreting abdominal radiographs for NEC.
  • To assess agreement levels between attending physicians and trainees.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty abdominal radiographs from premature infants with suspected NEC were reviewed.
  • Attending radiologists, pediatric surgeons, and trainees independently assessed films for NEC findings.
  • Fleiss's Kappa statistic was used to quantify inter-rater agreement.

Main Results:

  • Radiologists demonstrated excellent agreement (Kappa=0.81).
  • Agreement between surgeons and radiologists was moderate (Kappa=0.59).
  • Agreement was poor for decubitus films, especially between surgeons and radiologists (Kappa=0.15).

Conclusions:

  • While attending radiologists exhibit high agreement, inter-disciplinary agreement with surgeons is moderate.
  • Trainee agreement with attendings was fair, suggesting a need for improved training and communication.
  • Decubitus films may have limited utility in NEC evaluation due to poor agreement.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation01:25

Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation

Introduction
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
3.5K
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion01:18

Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion

Percussion is a fundamental technique used to assess the liver, spleen, and abdominal organs by tapping the abdomen and interpreting the resulting sounds. This method helps identify fluid, distention, and masses through variations in sound, such as the high-pitched tympany of air-filled areas and the dullness of solid masses. Understanding how to percuss these organs provides valuable information for healthcare professionals in diagnosing conditions early.
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
3.8K
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus01:25

Assessment of the Rectum and Anus

Evaluating the rectum and anus plays a crucial role in conducting a thorough physical examination of the gastrointestinal system. Although it may be uncomfortable and often embarrassing for the patient, it holds immense diagnostic value, particularly in detecting gastrointestinal diseases and abnormalities. This guide will explain how to perform this assessment using inspection and palpation methods.
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
2.1K
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation01:23

Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation

Palpation is a crucial tactile examination method for assessing abdominal organs and detecting conditions like tenderness, distention, masses, or fluid. It involves both light and deep palpation techniques, each serving specific diagnostic purposes. Light palpation helps identify tenderness and other surface-level indicators, while deep palpation locates and assess abdominal masses and organ boundaries. A skilled professional can gather valuable insights through palpation, including evaluating...
5.6K