Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:33

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry

6.2K
Tandem mass spectrometry, also known as MS/MS or MS2, is an analytical technique that employs two mass analyzers. Essentially it is a series of mass spectrometers that helps isolate a particular biomolecule and then helps study its chemical properties.
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...
6.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scaffold-free 3D-cell co-culture model system for the study of metastatic cancer in the brain TME.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Scaffold-free 3D-Cell Co-Culture Model System for the Study of Metastatic Cancer Cell Behavior in the Brain TME.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Proteomic technologies for profiling cell-membrane/secretome interactions in brain metastatic cancer progression.

Expert review of proteomics·2025
Same author

Proteomic assessment of SKBR3/HER2+ breast cancer cellular response to Lapatinib and investigational Ipatasertib kinase inhibitors.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2024
Same author

Proteomic insights into breast cancer response to brain cell-secreted factors.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Proteomic Assessment of SKBR3/HER2+ Breast Cancer Cellular Response to Lapatinib and Investigational Ipatasertib Kinase Inhibitors.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

The ACS at 150: The History of Analytical Chemistry Publications and a Century of Progress.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Machine Learning-Enabled Image Analysis of Complex Chemical Mixtures: Synthetic Urine Droplets as a Test System.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/Viscosity Tandem-Locked Fluorescent Probes Based on an In Situ Fluorophore Synthesis Strategy for Colitis Imaging and Diagnosis.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

TopoStitcher: A Geometric-Topological Structure-Guided Stitching Framework for Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Noninvasive SERS Immunosensing of Tyrosinase for Melanoma Monitoring via Microneedle Sampling Integrated with Satellite-Structured Bifunctional Nanozymes.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Label-Free Electrochemical CRISPR Platform Gated by Allosteric Transcription Factors for Ultrasensitive Small-Molecule Detection.

Analytical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

11.4K

Endogenous protein "barcode" for data validation and normalization in quantitative MS analysis.

Wooram Lee1, Iulia M Lazar

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , 1981 Kraft Drive, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.

Analytical Chemistry
|May 27, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Common housekeeping proteins are unreliable for quantitative proteomic experiments. This study introduces a novel protein "barcode" for accurate data normalization and validation in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

More Related Videos

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools
07:01

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.2K
Protease- and Acid-catalyzed Labeling Workflows Employing 18O-enriched Water
09:43

Protease- and Acid-catalyzed Labeling Workflows Employing 18O-enriched Water

Published on: February 20, 2013

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

11.4K
Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools
07:01

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.2K
Protease- and Acid-catalyzed Labeling Workflows Employing 18O-enriched Water
09:43

Protease- and Acid-catalyzed Labeling Workflows Employing 18O-enriched Water

Published on: February 20, 2013

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Mass Spectrometry
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Quantitative proteomic experiments rely on stable endogenous controls for data normalization and validation.
  • Traditional housekeeping proteins (e.g., actin, tubulin) exhibit variable expression, compromising data integrity.
  • Cell type, cell cycle, and disease status influence housekeeping protein levels, leading to erroneous conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel protein
  • barcode
  • for reliable data normalization and validation in quantitative proteomic studies.
  • To identify stable protein sets for use as endogenous standards in mass spectrometry-based experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative proteomic experiments using mass spectrometry.
  • Generation and selection of protein sets from cell cycle experiments in MCF7 and MCF10A cell lines.
  • Analysis of spectral count data stability from ~3700 identified proteins.
  • Validation of protein barcode sets using a complementary SKBR3/Her2+ cell line.

Main Results:

  • A novel protein
  • barcode
  • concept was advanced for quantitative proteomics.
  • Eleven proteins were identified as nuclear endogenous standards.
  • Sixty-two proteins were identified as cytoplasmic endogenous standards.
  • Protein barcode sets demonstrated validation utility in a complementary cell line.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed protein
  • barcode
  • offers a more robust approach for data normalization and validation compared to traditional housekeeping proteins.
  • This method enhances the reliability of quantitative proteomic data, particularly in studies involving cell cycle or disease variations.
  • The identified protein sets serve as valuable endogenous standards for future proteomic research.