Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Traditional Trail Making Test Modified into Brand-new Assessment Tools: Digital and Walking Trail Making Test
Published on: November 23, 2019
The Bandim TBscore--reliability, further development, and evaluation of potential uses
1Bandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau; Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; frauke.rudolf@ki.au.dk.
Background:
The tuberculosis (TB) case detection rate has stagnated at 60% due to disorganized case finding and insensitivity of sputum smear microscopy. Of the identified TB cases, 4% die while being treated, monitored with tools that insufficiently predict failure/mortality.
Objective:
To explore the TBscore, a recently proposed clinical severity measure for pulmonary TB (PTB) patients, and to refine, validate, and investigate its place in case finding.
Design:
The TBscore's inter-observer agreement was assessed and compared to the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) (paper I). The TBscore's variables underlying constructs were assessed, sorting out unrelated items, proposing a more easily assessable TBscoreII, which was validated internally and externally (paper II). Finally, TBscore and TBscoreII's place in PTB-screening was examined in paper III.
Results:
The inter-observer variability when grading PTB patients into severity classes was moderate for both TBscore (κW=0.52, 95% CI 0.46-0.56) and KPS (κW=0.49, 95% CI 0.33-0.65). KPS was influenced by HIV status, whereas TBscore was unaffected by it. In paper II, proposed TBscoreII was validated internally, in Guinea-Bissau, and externally, in Ethiopia. In both settings, a failure to bring down the score by ≥25% from baseline to 2 months of treatment predicted subsequent failure (p=0.007). Finally, in paper III, TBscore and TBscoreII were assessed in health-care-seeking adults and found to be higher in PTB-diagnosed patients, 4.9 (95% CI 4.6-5.2) and 3.9 (95% CI 3.8-4.0), respectively, versus patients not diagnosed with PTB, 3.0 (95% CI 2.7-3.2) and 2.4 (95% CI 2.3-2.5), respectively. Had we referred only patients with cough >2 weeks to sputum smear, we would have missed 32.1% of the smear confirmed cases in our cohort. A TBscoreII>=2 missed 8.6%.
Conclusions:
TBscore and TBscoreII are useful monitoring tools for PTB patients on treatment, as they could fill the void which currently exists in risk grading of patients. They may also have a role in PTB screening; however, this requires our findings to be repeated elsewhere.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...

