Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
07:30

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

7.4K

Lags in measuring eye-hand coordination.

Liam J B Hill1, Peter R Culmer2, Mark Mon-Williams1

  • 1Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Journal of Neuroscience Methods
|May 27, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative social costs of six early years disadvantages: a birth cohort microsimulation study.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
Same author

Measuring In-Shoe Plantar Strain Outcomes in the Presence of Callus: A Preliminary Study Using the STAMPS3D Measurement System.

Journal of foot and ankle research·2026
Same author

Turning the 10-year NHS plan into a 50-year legacy: the centrality of children and young people.

Archives of disease in childhood·2026
Same author

An Aha moment precedes the strategic response to a visuomotor rotation.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

"The system is a bit broken…" a qualitative exploration of barriers in the pathway for diagnosing Developmental Coordination Disorder.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Diabetic Socks: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Commercially Available Products.

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews·2026
Same journal

Time as the language of Behavior: events, sequences, patterns and meanings.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Detection of cochlear microphonic for differential diagnosis between auditory neuropathy mice and noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss mice.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Assessment metrics for pain control in rats: A methodological commentary.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Infant EEG preprocessing pipelines: A capability framework and current gaps in practice.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Methods for measuring neural activity during voluntary wheel running.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Serotype-dependent differences in AAV cellular transduction rates in the hypothalamus of Arctic ground squirrels.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
See all related articles

This commentary questions the novelty of a computerised eye-hand coordination (EHC) assessment method. It highlights prior innovative systems, arguing for their comparable or superior contributions to the field.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Motor Control Research

Background:

  • A recent publication (Lee et al., 2014) introduced a computerised methodology for assessing eye-hand coordination (EHC).
  • The authors of this commentary contest the claims of novelty and innovation presented in the Lee et al. paper.
  • Existing literature includes pre-existing computerised systems for EHC assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the novelty claims of the computerised eye-hand coordination (EHC) assessment methodology presented by Lee et al. (2014).
  • To present evidence of similar or superior innovative contributions from previously published and contemporaneous computerised systems for EHC assessment.
  • To acknowledge the utility of the Lee et al. system while emphasizing the broader scholarly landscape.
Keywords:
Computer-basedDevelopmentEye–hand coordinationObjective

More Related Videos

Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice
10:07

Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice

Published on: May 29, 2013

103.3K
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
07:30

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

7.4K
Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice
10:07

Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice

Published on: May 29, 2013

103.3K
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

2.9K

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of the Lee et al. (2014) methodology against existing computerised systems for eye-hand coordination (EHC) assessment.
  • Literature review of published works on computerised EHC assessment systems.
  • Scholarly argumentation regarding the relative innovativeness of different EHC assessment approaches.

Main Results:

  • Identification of pre-existing computerised systems for eye-hand coordination (EHC) assessment that exhibit significant innovation.
  • Argumentation that alternative, previously published systems are equally, if not more, innovative than the method proposed by Lee et al. (2014).
  • Contextualization of the Lee et al. contribution within the broader history of EHC research.

Conclusions:

  • The claims for novelty and innovation regarding the computerised eye-hand coordination (EHC) assessment by Lee et al. (2014) are challenged.
  • Prior scholarly work in computerised EHC assessment demonstrates comparable or greater innovation.
  • This commentary underscores the importance of recognizing cumulative scholarly contributions in the field of EHC assessment.