Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations
1kamos@phf.org, Project Manager , Council on Linkages Between Academia and Public Health Practice, Public Health Foundation, 1300 L Street Northwest, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005.
Abstract:
This study explored national differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication in retracted biomedical literature. The national affiliations of authors and reasons for retraction of papers accessible through PubMed that were published from 2008 to 2012 and subsequently retracted were determined in order to identify countries with the largest numbers and highest rates of retraction due to plagiarism and duplicate publication. Authors from more than fifty countries retracted papers. While the United States retracted the most papers, China retracted the most papers for plagiarism and duplicate publication. Rates of plagiarism and duplicate publication were highest in Italy and Finland, respectively. Unethical publishing practices cut across nations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Replication in Eukaryotes
Replication in Eukaryotes
Many Proteins Orchestrate Replication at the Origin
Eukaryotic replication follows many of the same...
Reproductive Cloning
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
In SCNT, an egg cell is taken from an animal and its nucleus is removed, creating an enucleated egg. Then a somatic...
Ethics in Research
Replication in Prokaryotes
Replication in Prokaryotes
Many Proteins Work Together to Replicate the Chromosome
Replication is coordinated and carried out by a host of specialized...

