Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

08:30
X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
18.9K
Evaluation of automatic exposure control options in digital mammography
Yifang Zhou1, Alexander Scott2, Janet Allahverdian2
1Department of Radiation Safety, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology
|May 29, 2014
Summary
Automatic exposure control (AEC) table 1 in digital mammography offers improved image quality for thinner breasts but can reduce it for thicker ones. Microcalcification detection is significantly better with table 1 for breasts 5 cm and thicker.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Technology
Background:
- Digital mammography utilizes automatic exposure control (AEC) to optimize image quality and radiation dose.
- Different AEC tables offer varying trade-offs between image quality and radiation exposure.
- Understanding these trade-offs is crucial for selecting optimal imaging protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the dose and image quality trade-offs between two AEC tables (default 'table 0' and 'table 1') on the Hologic Selenia system.
- To evaluate the impact of AEC table selection on the detectability of simulated lesions and microcalcifications.
- To assess the performance across a range of breast thicknesses (4.5 cm-7 cm).
Main Methods:
- Comparison of two AEC tables using realistically-shaped phantoms of varying thicknesses.
- Calculation of a figure of merit (FOM) based on squared contrast-to-noise ratio per mean glandular dose.
- Application of contrast-to-noise ratios to simulated lesions on anthropomorphic breast phantoms for lesion detection scoring.
Main Results:
- AEC table 1 improved low contrast FOM by 11%-20% for breast thicknesses of 4.5-6 cm, but decreased it by 17% for 7 cm.
- Microcalcification FOM improved slightly for 4.5-6 cm breasts and decreased by 18% for 7 cm breasts with table 1.
- Lesion simulation showed enhanced contrast with table 1 for 5-7 cm breasts, with diminishing enhancement for greater thickness. Microcalcification detection scores were significantly higher with table 1 for 5-7 cm breasts.
Conclusions:
- AEC table 1 provides benefits for image quality and lesion detection in thinner to moderately thick breasts.
- Performance of AEC table 1 degrades for thicker breasts (7 cm), impacting both FOM and lesion detectability.
- The choice of AEC table involves a trade-off dependent on breast thickness, requiring careful consideration for optimal mammographic imaging.

