Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Heritability01:06

Heritability

975
Heritability is a statistical concept that measures the degree to which genetic differences among individuals contribute to trait variations within a population. It is a fundamental idea in genetics, often prone to misinterpretation. Heritability is expressed as a percentage, reflecting the proportion of variation in a specific trait across a population that can be linked to genetic differences. However, it's important to understand that heritability does not determine how "genetic"...
975
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

15.4K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.4K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

62.5K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
62.5K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

29.7K
Overview
29.7K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

99.9K
Overview
99.9K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

11.8K
11.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An MHC class II supertype confers resistance to a sexually transmitted bacterium in females but not in males in a genetically monogamous seabird.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2025
Same author

Major histocompatibility complex class IIB disassortative mate choice in a genetically monogamous seabird.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

What maintains variation in flower accessibility to pollinators in plant communities? A simulation study.

BMC ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Male attractiveness in fruit flies is influenced by previous exposure of females to males of different attractiveness.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Long-term social memory of mate copying in Drosophila melanogaster is localized in mushroom bodies.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Dynamics of Insects and Their Facultative Defensive Endosymbiotic Bacteria: A Simulation Model.

Ecology and evolution·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K

Avoiding pitfalls in estimating heritability with the common options approach.

Etienne Danchin1, Eric Wajnberg2, Richard H Wagner3

  • 11] CNRS, UPS, ENFA; EDB (Laboratoire Evolution & Diversité Biologique); UMR5174; 118 route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse, France [2] Université de Toulouse; UMR5174; F-31062 Toulouse, France.

Scientific Reports
|May 29, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Heritability estimates can be flawed by spatial and regression to the mean (RTM) fallacies. To avoid these, experiments must ensure all individuals have identical options, like being fostered in the same location.

More Related Videos

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

7.6K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

7.6K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Quantitative Genetics

Background:

  • Heritability estimates are crucial for understanding trait inheritance.
  • Estimates can be compromised by spatial and regression to the mean (RTM) fallacies.
  • These fallacies arise from differing options or extreme measurements preceding average ones.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the impact of spatial and RTM fallacies on heritability estimates.
  • To investigate these fallacies in the context of colony size choice behavior.
  • To identify experimental designs immune to these estimation pitfalls.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated data from a large-scale heritability study of colony size choice.
  • Analyzed both experimental and correlative heritability estimates.
  • Compared classic cross-foster designs with designs offering identical options.

Main Results:

  • Spurious heritabilities were generated under various conditions for both experimental and correlative estimates.
  • Classic cross-foster experiments can exacerbate the frequency of spurious heritabilities.
  • Experiments providing identical options (e.g., same fostering location) were immune to both fallacies.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial and RTM fallacies pose significant challenges to accurate heritability estimation.
  • Standard experimental designs may inadvertently inflate heritability estimates.
  • Controlled experimental setups ensuring uniform conditions are essential for robust heritability studies.