Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Self-Discrepancy Theory

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...

Stereotype Content Model

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

Halo Effect

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Single cell spatial profiling of FFPE splenic tissue from a humanized mouse model of HIV infection.

Biomarker research·2024

Same author

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs Compared With Panretinal Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2024

Same author

AMPL: A Data-Driven Modeling Pipeline for Drug Discovery.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2020

Same author

New Zealand Policy on Frozen Embryo Disputes.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2020

Same author

Cancer of the Pancreas-Actual 5, 10, and 20+Year Survival: The Lucky and Fortunate Few.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2017

Same author

Improving services for people with alcohol-related problems.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2009

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The competence gap.

Tom Rush¹, Carolyn Mason

¹Northern Ireland.

Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)

|May 29, 2014

Summary

In-house training for healthcare assistants (HCAs) appears insufficient. Employers should prioritize enhancing HCA skills development to improve care quality.

Area of Science:

Healthcare education
Professional development

Background:

Healthcare assistants (HCAs) play a vital role in patient care.
Assessing the adequacy of current in-house training programs for HCAs is crucial for maintaining high standards of healthcare delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of existing in-house training for healthcare assistants (HCAs).
To identify potential gaps in HCA skill sets and training.
To recommend improvements in employer-provided training.

Main Methods:

The study involved an assessment of healthcare assistants' (HCAs) skills.
Analysis focused on the outcomes and content of in-house training programs.

Main Results:

Findings indicate that current in-house training for healthcare assistants (HCAs) may not be meeting the required skill standards.

Related Experiment Videos

Specific skill deficiencies were observed, suggesting a need for more comprehensive training.

Conclusions:

In-house training for HCAs is likely inadequate and requires significant improvement.
Employers must prioritize and invest in robust training initiatives for HCAs to ensure competency and quality care.