Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026
![Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58641.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury
Published on: November 9, 2018
Quantification of 18F-Fluoride Kinetics: Evaluation of Simplified Methods
Pieter Raijmakers1, Olivier P P Temmerman2, Carrol P Saridin3
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MOVE Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands p.raijmakers@vumc.nl.
Simplified methods like Patlak and SUV accurately assess (18)F-fluoride kinetics in bone metabolism studies. However, (18)F-fluoride PET shows limited accuracy for measuring bone blood flow.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiochemistry
- Bone Metabolism
Background:
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with Fluorine-18 ((18)F-fluoride) is a key imaging modality for assessing bone metabolism and blood flow.
- Accurate kinetic analysis is crucial for reliable interpretation of PET data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of simplified clinical methods (Patlak, SUV) against full kinetic analysis for (18)F-fluoride PET.
- To investigate the validity of using (18)F-fluoride K1 to derive bone blood flow, using Oxygen-15-labeled water ((15)O-H2O) as a reference.
Main Methods:
- Dynamic PET scans with (18)F-fluoride and (15)O-H2O were performed on 22 adults (16 patients, 6 healthy volunteers).
- Arterial blood was continuously monitored.
- (18)F-fluoride data were analyzed using nonlinear regression (NLR), Patlak, and standardized uptake value (SUV) methods.
Main Results:
- Patlak analysis (10-60 min) yielded a mean fluoride influx rate (Ki) highly correlated with NLR-derived Ki (r=0.976).
- Lean body mass-normalized SUV (50-60 min) also showed a strong correlation with Ki (r=0.958).
- (18)F-fluoride K1 demonstrated a low correlation with measured bone blood flow (r=0.35).
Conclusions:
- Both Patlak and SUV methods are suitable for assessing (18)F-fluoride kinetics in human bone.
- (18)F-fluoride PET has limitations in accurately monitoring bone blood flow.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Elimination Rate Constant, Half-Life and Volume of Distribution

