Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial interactions in rapid pattern discrimination.

B J Kröse1, C A Burbeck

  • 1California Institute of Technology, Pasadena 91125.

Spatial Vision
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring perceived 3D shape at multiple spatial scales.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Scaled medial axis representation: evidence from position discrimination task.

Vision research·1998
Same author

Across-object relationships in perceived object orientation.

Vision research·1997
Same author

Occlusion edge blur: a cue to relative visual depth.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·1996
Same author

Linking object boundaries at scale: a common mechanism for size and shape judgments.

Vision research·1996
Same author

Object representation by cores: identifying and representing primitive spatial regions.

Vision research·1995

Even with a known target location, distracters significantly slow reaction times (RTs). This visual search effect depends on distracter proximity, not just target uncertainty.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive psychology

Background:

  • Reaction times (RTs) in visual search are influenced by distracter elements.
  • Understanding how distracter proximity affects RTs is crucial for visual processing models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of distracter elements on target identification RTs under stabilized image conditions.
  • To determine if distracter effects are solely due to positional uncertainty or other factors.

Main Methods:

  • Participants identified a target among distracters with fixed positions within a session.
  • Image stabilization minimized eye movements and search requirements.
  • Distracter proximity to the target and fovea were systematically varied.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Even a single distracter increased RTs.
  • RT increase correlated with distracter distance from the target and, for some, the fovea.
  • Adding distracters in a ring around the target further elevated RTs.

Conclusions:

  • Distracters significantly impair visual search performance, even when target location is known.
  • The proximity of distracters to the target is a key factor influencing RTs.
  • These findings suggest distracter effects extend beyond simple positional uncertainty in visual search.