Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans
Published on: December 11, 2016
Heterogeneity of muscle damage induced by electrostimulation: a multimodal MRI study
Alexandre Fouré1, Guillaume Duhamel, Jennifer Wegrzyk
11Aix-Marseille University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale (CRMBM), Unité Mixte de Recherche 7339, Marseille, FRANCE; 2Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM), La Timone Hospital, Imaging Center, Centre d'Exploration Métabolique par Résonance Magnétique (CEMEREM), Marseille, FRANCE; and 3APHM, Sainte Marguerite Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Marseille, FRANCE.
Purpose:
Neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) leads to a spatially fixed, synchronous, and superficial motor unit recruitment, which could induce muscle damage. Therefore, the extent of muscle damage and its spatial occurrence were expected to be heterogeneous across and along the quadriceps femoris (QF) muscles. The aim of the present study was to characterize muscle spatial heterogeneity in QF damage after a single bout of isometric NMES using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Methods:
Twenty-five young healthy males participated in this study. MRI investigations consisted of the assessment of muscle volume, transverse relaxation time (T2), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in muscles positioned near the stimulation electrodes (i.e., vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM)) and muscles located outside the stimulated regions (i.e., vastus intermedius and rectus femoris). These measurements were performed 6 d before, and 2 d and 4 d (D4) after the NMES session.
Results:
For the muscles placed in direct contact with the stimulation electrodes, volume (VL, +8.5%; VM, +3.8%), T2 (VL, +19.5%; VM, +6.7%) and radial diffusivity (λ3) (VL, + 7.3%; VM, +3.7%) significantly increased at D4. Whereas MRI parameter changes were larger for VL as compared with those for other QF muscles at D4, homogeneous alterations were found along all QF muscles.
Conclusions:
Isometric NMES induced specific and localized alterations in VL and VM, with heterogeneous damage amplitude among them. Potential effects of unaccustomed intermuscle shear stress during electrically evoked isometric contractions could be a key factor in the spatial occurrence and the extent of damage among QF muscles (especially in VL). The kinetics and extent of MRI changes varied between T2 and diffusion tensor imaging metrics, suggesting the involvement of different physiological processes.
More Related Videos
07:53Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Published on: September 13, 2015
12:13Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography
Published on: October 7, 2025