Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
Public perception regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Matthew J Matava1, Daniel R Howard1, Landon Polakof1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, 14532 South Outer Forty Drive, St. Louis, MO 63017. E-mail address for M.J. Matava: matavam@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Background:
Relatively little information exists regarding the public's perception of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and their treatment. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the public's understanding of ACL surgery may be incorrect with regard to various aspects of this procedure and to identify issues to emphasize in patient education.
Methods:
This study utilized a forty-three-question survey designed to measure an individual's knowledge base and perception of ACL reconstruction with regard to the anatomy, function, indications, operative technique, risks, recovery time, and overall benefits of the procedure. Eligible individuals were between fifteen and sixty years of age. Study participants were recruited from an academic orthopaedic sports medicine clinic, a collegiate athletic training room, and various public venues.
Results:
A total of 210 individuals (106 men and 104 women) with a mean age of thirty were surveyed. Educational level of the respondents varied widely. Twenty-seven percent of the respondents were employed in a health-care setting. Sixty-five percent of the respondents rated their ACL knowledge level as "little" or "none." Participants' self-perception of ACL knowledge was highly correlated with their survey scores on questions with a specific correct answer (p < 0.001). Almost one-third thought that surgical treatment involved repair of the torn ligament rather than reconstruction. Over half (56%) of the respondents preferred an autograft for ligament reconstruction, compared with 4% who preferred an allograft. The ability to return to sports after ACL surgery was the most important concern, followed by the risk of developing osteoarthritis.
Conclusions:
There is wide variability in the lay public's knowledge level of ACL injuries; a substantial number of misguided perceptions were identified. Return to sports and risk for future osteoarthritis following ACL surgery appear to be the most important factors to the lay public. Focusing educational efforts on areas of knowledge deficits may be particularly important for patients of physicians who treat ACL injuries.
More Related Videos
08:30Surgical Retrieval, Isolation and In vitro Expansion of Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament-derived Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications
Published on: April 30, 2014
06:27Author Spotlight: Investigating Early Events and Long-Term Effects of ACL Injuries for Osteoarthritis Progression
Published on: September 29, 2023