Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Impact of a randomized clinical trial on children with perforated appendicitis
Regan F Williams1, Rodrigo B Interiano1, Elizabeth Paton1
1LeBonheur Children's Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
Insights
A clinical trial on perforated appendicitis changed hospital practices, increasing early appendectomy rates and reducing adverse events like infections and readmissions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Clinical Trial Outcomes
Background:
- Previous randomized trial compared early vs. interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.
- Study evaluates the impact of this trial on subsequent practice patterns and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- Assess changes in treatment strategies for perforated appendicitis post-clinical trial.
- Evaluate the effect of the trial on patient outcomes and healthcare utilization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study comparing patients treated before (2005-2006) and after (2009-2011) the clinical trial.
- Data collected on patient characteristics, treatment variables, and outcomes.
- Comparison of early appendectomy (within 24 hours) versus interval appendectomy (4-6 weeks post-antibiotics).
Main Results:
- Post-trial group showed a significant increase in early appendectomy rates (84% vs. 67%).
- Reduced adverse events in the post-trial group, including fewer wound infections (2% vs. 14%) and unplanned readmissions (7% vs. 16%).
- Fewer computed tomography scans were used per patient in the post-trial group.
Conclusions:
- The clinical trial successfully altered practice patterns regarding perforated appendicitis treatment at the institution.
- Post-trial, early appendectomy became more common, CT scan use decreased, and overall adverse events were reduced.
Background:
We previously conducted a randomized, clinical trial comparing early appendectomy with interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect this clinical trial had on subsequent practice patterns and outcomes for patients with perforated appendicitis at the free-standing children's hospital conducting the trial.
Methods:
A retrospective study was conducted comparing children with perforated appendicitis treated before the trial (2005-2006) and after the trial (2009-2011). Early appendectomy was performed within 24 hours of diagnosis; interval appendectomy occurred 4-6 weeks after initial treatment with antibiotics. Patient characteristics, treatment variables, and outcomes were collected and compared.
Results:
The pretrial group consisted of 92 patients-62 (67%) underwent early appendectomy, and 30 (33%) patients had interval appendectomy. The posttrial group was composed of 103 patients, with 87 (84%) undergoing early appendectomy and 16 (16%) interval appendectomy (P = .005). The groups were similar in patient and admission characteristics, although the posttrial group had a lower percentage of self-pay patients and fewer computed tomography scans; health care use was similar between groups. Overall, the posttrial group had fewer adverse events (18% vs 34%, P = .02), specifically fewer wound infections (2% vs 14%, P = .001) and fewer unplanned readmissions (7% vs 16%, P = .04) than the pretrial group. In the posttrial group, those patients selected for interval appendectomy were more likely to complete the planned course of therapy than in the pretrial group.
Conclusion:
A clinical trial conducted at our institution to evaluate currently available treatment options for perforated appendicitis did change practice patterns at our hospital. After the trial, there was an increase in the use of early appendectomy, a decrease in the number of computed tomography scans performed per patient, and a reduction in the overall adverse event rate.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
01:22Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
01:19Appendicitis