Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of functionally significant obstructive coronary
Rebabonye B Pharithi1, Martinus Meela, Thomas Kropmans
1Department of Cardiology, St Lukes hospital, Freshford Road, Kilkenny, Republic of Ireland. rpharithi@gmail.com.
Insights
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may be a non-invasive alternative to fractional flow reserve (FFR) for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). This review assesses CMR
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Diagnostic Accuracy
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion imaging is a potential non-invasive method for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
- It is being considered as an alternative to pressure wire-guided fractional flow reserve (FFR) for assessing haemodynamic significance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and determine the diagnostic accuracy of CMR in detecting haemodynamically significant obstructive CAD.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of CMR against FFR.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies comparing CMR and FFR.
- Literature search of multiple databases (Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane) up to November 2013.
- Quality assessment using QUADAS-2 tool; data extraction and analysis using STATA 13 (xtmelogit) for pooled sensitivity and specificity.
- Generation of forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curves.
- Sub-group analyses based on CMR image quality (Tesla) and analysis basis (coronary territory vs. patient) at different FFR cutoffs (≤0.75, ≤0.8).
Main Results:
- This section is to be populated once the systematic review is completed and results are available.
Conclusions:
- This systematic review aims to establish whether CMR is a suitable non-invasive alternative to FFR for diagnosing significant obstructive CAD.
- The review will also evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of specific CMR techniques at varying FFR thresholds.
Background:
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion imaging has been suggested as a non-invasive alternative to pressure wire guided fractional flow reserve (FFR) in detecting haemodynamically significant obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective of this systematic review is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CMR and to compare it to FFR.
Methods/Design:
A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy of CMR and FFR will be conducted. Relevant English-language articles published before November 2013 in Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar, Scopus and Cochrane databases will be identified. Relevant referenced articles from those selected will also be analysed. Articles describing diagnostic studies that compared CMR to FFR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease will be included. Two investigators will independently screen, assess quality and extract data from the selected articles. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool will be used to assess methodological quality. STATA 13 (the xtmelogit command) software will be used to calculate bivariate random effects models and estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals. Forests plots and summary receiver operating characteristics curves will also be generated. Sub-group pooled analyses using image quality of CMR (in terms of magnetic flux density - Tesla) and basis of analyses (coronary arterial territory vs. patients basis) at different FFR cutoffs (≤0.75 and ≤0.8) will also be performed.
Discussion:
This systematic review will help to determine if CMR is an adequate alternative to FFR in the diagnosis of significant and obstructive CAD. We will also be able to assess diagnostic accuracy of specific types of CMR scan at different FFR cutoffs.
Systematic Review Registration:
This systematic review had been registered at PROSPERO and the registration number is CRD42013006180.
More Related Videos
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies