Cost-effectiveness of interventions for increasing the possession of functioning smoke alarms in households with

Pedro Saramago, Nicola J Cooper1, Alex J Sutton

  • 1Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2nd Floor Adrian Building, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK. njc21@leicester.ac.uk.

BMC Public Health
|June 3, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Implementing education and free smoke alarms is the most cost-effective way to prevent child fire injuries in the UK. This intervention significantly reduces risks and improves quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for children.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Economics
  • Child Safety

Background:

  • The UK faces high rates of fire-related deaths in children (0-14 years) compared to similar nations.
  • Smoke alarms are proven to reduce fire injury risks, but their cost-effectiveness for child safety is understudied.
  • This research addresses the economic evaluation of interventions promoting functional smoke alarm uptake.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the cost-effectiveness of various interventions aimed at increasing the use of functioning smoke alarms.
  • To evaluate the impact of these interventions on preventing fire-related injuries in children within the UK.
  • To inform public health policy regarding child fire safety initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • A decision model-based probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted.
  • A hypothetical cohort of newborns was studied over their lifetime, focusing on the first 5 years with or without a functioning smoke alarm.
  • Seven interventions, from usual care to comprehensive packages (education, equipment, fitting, inspection), were compared.

Main Results:

  • The most cost-effective intervention involved education combined with free/low-cost equipment, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £34,200 per QALY gained versus usual care.
  • The ICER decreased substantially to approximately £4,500 per QALY gained when assuming 1.8 children under 5 per household.
  • This highlights the significant impact of household size on cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis is crucial for public sector resource allocation under budget constraints.
  • More effective interventions are not always the most cost-effective.
  • Targeted strategies, like education and equipment provision, offer a strong value for money in child fire injury prevention.
Abstract