Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
How should periods without social interaction be scheduled? Children's preference for practical schedules of positive
Kevin C Luczynski1, Gregory P Hanley
1University of Nebraska Medical Center's Munroe-Meyer Institute.
Insights
Children prefer practical reinforcement schedules, choosing a multiple schedule over delayed or noncontingent reinforcement. This indicates a preference for contingent reinforcement in social interaction settings.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Child Development
- Reinforcement Schedules
Background:
- Previous research indicates children prefer contingent reinforcement (CR) over noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) when continuous reinforcement is used.
- However, children's preferences for practical CR schedules have not been extensively evaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess children's preferences for different practical schedules of social interaction.
- To identify the variables influencing these preferences.
Main Methods:
- Study 1: Assessed preference of 5 children for social interaction via a multiple schedule, a delayed reinforcement schedule, and an NCR schedule.
- Study 2: Evaluated controlling variables for one child's preference for the multiple schedule.
Main Results:
- The multiple schedule resulted in the most efficient responding.
- Children generally preferred the multiple schedule and avoided the delayed and NCR schedules.
- A strong positive contingency was identified as the primary variable influencing preference for the multiple schedule.
Conclusions:
- Children prefer multiple schedules for arranging practical social interaction, demonstrating a preference for contingent reinforcement.
- The efficiency and clear contingency of the multiple schedule are key factors in children's choices.
Abstract:
Several studies have shown that children prefer contingent reinforcement (CR) rather than yoked noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) when continuous reinforcement is programmed in the CR schedule. Preference has not, however, been evaluated for practical schedules that involve CR. In Study 1, we assessed 5 children's preference for obtaining social interaction via a multiple schedule (periods of fixed-ratio 1 reinforcement alternating with periods of extinction), a briefly signaled delayed reinforcement schedule, and an NCR schedule. The multiple schedule promoted the most efficient level of responding. In general, children chose to experience the multiple schedule and avoided the delay and NCR schedules, indicating that they preferred multiple schedules as the means to arrange practical schedules of social interaction. In Study 2, we evaluated potential controlling variables that influenced 1 child's preference for the multiple schedule and found that the strong positive contingency was the primary variable.
Related Concept Videos
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...

