Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Evaluation of six TPS algorithms in computing entrance and exit doses
Yun I Tan1, Mohamed Metwaly, Martin Glegg
1University of Glasgow. tanyuninn@gmail.com.
This study compared six treatment planning system (TPS) algorithms for accuracy in calculating radiation entrance and exit doses. While most algorithms showed good agreement for entrance doses, advanced algorithms like Monaco MC and Eclipse AXB demonstrated better accuracy for exit doses.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Dosimetry
Background:
- Accurate calculation of radiation doses is crucial for effective cancer treatment delivery.
- Treatment planning systems (TPS) are used to predict radiation doses, and their accuracy must be verified.
- In vivo dosimetry provides a method for verifying treatment accuracy by measuring doses directly on the patient.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the accuracy of six common TPS algorithms in calculating entrance and exit doses for a 6 MV photon beam.
- To assess the performance of different algorithms using ionization chamber and diode detector measurements in water phantoms.
- To provide a baseline for implementing in vivo dosimetry in clinical settings.
Main Methods:
- Six TPS algorithms were tested: Eclipse PBC, Eclipse AAA, Eclipse AXB, XiO Convolution, XiO Superposition, and Monaco MC.
- Measurements were performed in water phantoms using ionization chambers and diode detectors.
- Comparisons involved central axis point dose, 1D relative profiles, and 2D absolute gamma analysis (3%/3 mm).
Main Results:
- All tested TPS algorithms accurately computed entrance doses within 2% of measured values.
- XiO Convolution, XiO Superposition, Eclipse AXB, and Monaco MC showed good agreement (2%-3%) for exit doses with ionization chamber measurements.
- Eclipse PBC and AAA overestimated exit doses by up to 5.3% and 4.8%, respectively, due to assumptions of full backscatter.
- Monaco MC generally exhibited better 2D gamma pass rates, while Eclipse AXB showed discrepancies in dose profiles beyond 11.5 cm and at field edges.
Conclusions:
- Advanced TPS algorithms like Monaco MC and Eclipse AXB offer improved accuracy for calculating radiation exit doses compared to older algorithms.
- The findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate TPS algorithms for accurate in vivo dosimetry and treatment verification.
- This study provides valuable data for clinical departments to select and implement TPS algorithms for reliable reference comparisons in radiation therapy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Noncompartmental Analysis: Mean Residence Time
After the administration of a drug through intravenous bolus injection, the drug molecules are distributed throughout the body and remain there for varying periods. The MRT represents the average time these drug molecules stay in the...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

