Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Magnetic Resonance Guided Radiation Therapy for High-Grade Glioma in Pregnancy: Planning, Validation, and Adaptive Fetal Dose Monitoring.

Advances in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Dose delivery accuracy of advanced radiotherapy: 30 years of end-to-end dosimetry audits.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Feasibility of longitudinal relaxation rate mapping with non-Cartesian sampling and compressed sensing on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance linear accelerator.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Patient specific quality assurance: The final safety net in radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Clinicogenomic and Histopathologic Analyses of Supermassive Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and the Role of Ablative Radiotherapy.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

Respiratory motion effects and plan robustness for lattice radiation therapy.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same journal

Synthetic CT-enabled weekly adaptive radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Optimizing plan adaptation triggers through volumetric-dosimetric monitoring.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Method for simultaneous selection of treatment isocenters and margins for polymetastatic extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Pulse‑level characterization of low monitor unit deliveries on a modern linear accelerator using a plastic scintillation detector.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Improving image quality in terbium-161 phantom imaging: Quantitative evaluation of DEW and TEW scatter correction methods.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Latent density discrepancies in commercial lung-equivalent inserts and their clinical dosimetric impact.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on anatomical structures.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

10.8K

Reproducibility in patient-specific IMRT QA.

Elizabeth M McKenzie1, Peter A Balter, Francesco C Stingo

  • 1The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston. emckenzi123@gmail.com.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|June 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) reproducibility in a clinical setting. Setup variability often exceeded delivery variability, with radiographic film showing the lowest reproducibility among tested dosimeters.

More Related Videos

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.2K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

10.8K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.2K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) is crucial for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
  • Understanding the reproducibility of IMRT QA results in a clinical environment is essential for reliable treatment delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the reproducibility of patient-specific IMRT QA results in a clinical setting.
  • To compare the reproducibility of various IMRT QA dosimeters and analysis methods.

Main Methods:

  • Six clinical IMRT plans (varying complexity and prior QA pass/fail status) were delivered multiple times.
  • Reproducibility was assessed using radiographic film, ion chamber, 2D diode array (multiple configurations), helical diode array, and a multi-ion chamber phantom.
  • Variability from delivery and physical setup was investigated.

Main Results:

  • Setup variability was generally higher than delivery variability.
  • Radiographic film demonstrated the poorest reproducibility among the tested dosimeters.
  • All dosimetric devices showed a coefficient of variation <4% for QA results, with an average <2%.

Conclusions:

  • Various IMRT QA systems exhibit different abilities to consistently reproduce QA results.
  • Quantification of variability in IMRT QA dosimeters was provided.
  • Setup consistency is a significant factor in IMRT QA reproducibility.