Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

1.3K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.3K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.3K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.3K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

7.7K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
7.7K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

5.0K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
5.0K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.6K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.6K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

9.2K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
9.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Consistency of c-Met protein overexpression over time in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Histopathology·2026
Same author

Explainable machine learning in healthcare: methods, interpretation, and applications for clinical research.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

The association between residential natural vegetation exposure at diagnosis and colorectal cancer-specific mortality among colorectal cancer cases in Kentucky.

Environmental research·2025
Same author

Conformal Selection for Efficient and Accurate Compound Screening in Drug Discovery.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

A multi-ethnic polygenic risk score for chronic kidney disease is associated with increased risk of hypertension in African American individuals.

BMC nephrology·2025
Same author

Prospective real-world evaluation of t(11;14) prevalence and disease biology in multiple myeloma: MEDICI study analysis.

Blood advances·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K

A robust bayesian estimate of the concordance correlation coefficient.

Dai Feng1, Richard Baumgartner, Vladimir Svetnik

  • 1a Biometrics Research , Merck Research Laboratories , Rahway , New Jersey , USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|June 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary

We developed a robust Bayesian method for estimating the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), improving agreement assessment in biomarker validation and neuroscience research. This new approach enhances reliability for statistical biomarker qualification and assay validation.

Keywords:
Bayesian MCMCBootstrapConcordance correlation coefficientJackknifeMultivariate t-distributionRobust estimate

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

2.9K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biomarker Research
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of agreement is crucial for statistical biomarker qualification and assay validation.
  • The Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) is a widely used metric for evaluating agreement.
  • Robust estimation methods for CCC are statistically challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel Bayesian method for robust estimation of the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC).
  • To extend the method for incorporating confounding covariates and replications.
  • To compare the proposed method against existing alternatives.

Main Methods:

  • A Bayesian approach utilizing the multivariate Student's t-distribution for robust CCC estimation.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate method performance.
  • Application to real-world biomarker data from electroencephalography (EEG) studies.

Main Results:

  • The proposed Bayesian method demonstrates superior performance in robust CCC estimation compared to alternatives.
  • The extended method effectively handles confounding covariates and replications.
  • Validation using both simulated and real EEG biomarker datasets.

Conclusions:

  • The novel Bayesian method offers a robust and flexible approach for CCC estimation.
  • This method improves agreement assessment in biomarker qualification and validation.
  • The approach is particularly relevant for neuroscience applications, such as developing insomnia treatments.