Fear responses in domestic chicks as a function of the social environment

The open field or novel environment has been used to assess fear in many species but its validity for the domestic fowl has recently been questioned. Based primarily on experiments which involved manipulation of the social environment Gallup and Suarez proposed that, contrary to an emotionality or fear interpretation, "open-field behaviour in chickens represents a compromise between opposing tendencies to reinstate contact with conspecifics and to minimize detection in the face of possible predation". Predictions which can be made from the Gallup and Suarez model and from the fear hypothesis were tested by examining the effects of manipulating the social environment, during rearing and testing, on the open-field, hole-in-the-wall box and tonic immobility responses of domestic chicks. The results were inconsistent with predictions made from the Gallup and Suarez model but they conformed to the fear hypothesis. Furthermore, they were consistent with the majority of findings reported in the literature. Thus, while the opposing tendencies of reinstatement and predator evasion are, almost undoubtedly, important in many situations there remains considerable evidence for the role of fear in regulating the responses of domestic chicks to novel environments such as the open field. The two interpretations should not be considered mutually incompatible.