Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
Rapid prediction of biomechanical costs during action decisions
Ignasi Cos1, Julie Duque2, Paul Cisek3
1Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central, Département de Neuroscience, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Université Paris 6), UMR 7222, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Paris, France; and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7222, ISIR, Paris, France ignasi.cos@isir.upmc.fr.
Abstract:
When given a choice between actions that yield the same reward, we tend to prefer the one that requires the least effort. Recent studies have shown that humans are remarkably accurate at evaluating the effort of potential reaching actions and can predict the subtle energetic demand caused by the nonisotropic biomechanical properties of the arm. In the present study, we investigated the time course over which such information is computed and comes to influence decisions. Two independent approaches were used. First, subjects performed a reach decision task in which the time interval for deciding between two candidate reaching actions was varied from 200 to 800 ms. Second, we measured motor-evoked potential (MEPs) to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) to probe the evolving decision at different times after stimulus presentation. Both studies yielded a consistent conclusion: that a prediction of the effort associated with candidate movements is computed very quickly and influences decisions within 200 ms after presentation of the candidate actions. Furthermore, whereas the MEPs measured 150 ms after stimulus presentation were well correlated with the choices that subjects ultimately made, later in the trial the MEP amplitudes were primarily related to the muscular requirements of the chosen movement. This suggests that corticospinal excitability (CSE) initially reflects a competition between candidate actions and later changes to reflect the processes of preparing to implement the winning action choice.

