Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

MicroRNAs01:22

MicroRNAs

3.0K
MicroRNA (miRNA) are short, regulatory RNA transcribed from introns (non-coding regions of a gene) or intergenic regions (stretches of DNA present between genes). Several processing steps are required to form biologically active, mature miRNA. The initial transcript, called primary miRNA (pri-mRNA), base-pairs with itself, forming a stem-loop structure. Within the nucleus, an endonuclease enzyme, called Drosha, shortens the stem-loop structure into hairpin-shaped pre-miRNA. After the pre-miRNA...
3.0K
MicroRNAs01:22

MicroRNAs

21.0K
MicroRNA (miRNA) are short, regulatory RNA transcribed from introns—non-coding regions of a gene—or intergenic regions—stretches of DNA present between genes. Several processing steps are required to form biologically active, mature miRNA. The initial transcript, called primary miRNA (pri-mRNA), base-pairs with itself forming a stem-loop structure. Within the nucleus, an endonuclease enzyme, called Drosha, shortens the stem-loop structure into hairpin-shaped pre-miRNA. After...
21.0K
MicroRNAs01:22

MicroRNAs

9.8K
9.8K
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

24.3K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
24.3K
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

6.4K
6.4K
Experimental RNAi02:15

Experimental RNAi

6.5K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a cellular mechanism that inhibits gene expression by suppressing its transcription or activating the RNA degradation process. The mechanism was discovered by Andrew Fire and Craig Mello in 1998 in plants. Today, it is observed in almost all eukaryotes, including protozoa, flies, nematodes, insects, parasites, and mammals. This precise cellular mechanism of gene silencing has been developed into a technique that provides an efficient way to identify and determine the...
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cleavage of mRNAs by a minority of pachytene piRNAs improves sperm fitness.

Nature·2026
Same author

Biochemical principles of miRNA targeting in flies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Defining the roles of the Integrator, NEXT, and nuclear exosome complexes in Drosophila oogenesis.

Cell reports·2025
Same author

A guide to the biogenesis and functions of endogenous small non-coding RNAs in animals.

Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology·2025
Same author

Biochemical principles of miRNA targeting in flies.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Mouse Pachytene piRNAs Cleave Hundreds of Transcripts, But Alter the Steady-State Abundance of Only a Minority of Targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

In Vivo Nanovector Delivery of a Heart-specific MicroRNA-sponge
09:53

In Vivo Nanovector Delivery of a Heart-specific MicroRNA-sponge

Published on: June 15, 2018

7.2K

Competitive endogenous RNAs cannot alter microRNA function in vivo.

Jennifer A Broderick1, Phillip D Zamore1

  • 1RNA Therapeutics Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, ASC4-2053, 368 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.

Molecular Cell
|June 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study quantitatively assessed microRNA (miRNA) function in mouse liver. Findings suggest natural miRNA and binding site levels limit regulation by competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs).

More Related Videos

A Reporter Assay to Analyze Intronic microRNA Maturation in Mammalian Cells
06:48

A Reporter Assay to Analyze Intronic microRNA Maturation in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2022

1.4K
MicroRNA-based Regulation of Picornavirus Tropism
09:05

MicroRNA-based Regulation of Picornavirus Tropism

Published on: February 6, 2017

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

In Vivo Nanovector Delivery of a Heart-specific MicroRNA-sponge
09:53

In Vivo Nanovector Delivery of a Heart-specific MicroRNA-sponge

Published on: June 15, 2018

7.2K
A Reporter Assay to Analyze Intronic microRNA Maturation in Mammalian Cells
06:48

A Reporter Assay to Analyze Intronic microRNA Maturation in Mammalian Cells

Published on: June 16, 2022

1.4K
MicroRNA-based Regulation of Picornavirus Tropism
09:05

MicroRNA-based Regulation of Picornavirus Tropism

Published on: February 6, 2017

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology
  • Gene regulation
  • RNA biology

Background:

  • MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are key regulators of gene expression.
  • Competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) are proposed to regulate miRNAs by sponging.
  • The functional relevance of ceRNA networks in vivo remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively investigate the functional impact of miRNA regulation in adult mouse liver.
  • To determine the extent to which ceRNA mechanisms contribute to miRNA regulation in vivo.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative analysis of miRNA and mRNA expression in adult mouse liver.
  • Computational modeling to predict miRNA-target interactions and ceRNA activity.
  • Experimental validation of key predictions.

Main Results:

  • Natural miRNA abundance and binding site availability generally do not support significant ceRNA activity.
  • The proposed ceRNA mechanism is unlikely to be a major mode of miRNA regulation in the adult mouse liver under normal conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides quantitative evidence against widespread miRNA regulation via ceRNAs in the adult mouse liver.
  • Findings highlight the importance of endogenous miRNA and target abundance in determining regulatory mechanisms.