Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

417
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
417
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.4K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.4K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

407
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
407
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.8K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

1.7K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A note on point estimation and interval estimation of the relative treatment effect under a simple crossover design.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2021
Same author

Urinary metabolites of furan in waterpipe tobacco smokers compared to non-smokers in home settings in the US.

Toxicology letters·2020
Same author

Exact Confidence Limits on Some New Measures of Concordance and Discordance in Binary Outcomes.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2020
Same author

Exact interval estimators for some commonly used measures of binary agreement.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same author

Asymptotic and exact interval estimators of the common odds ratio under the sequential parallel comparison design.

Statistical methods in medical research·2018
Same author

Exact and asymptotic tests under the sequential parallel comparison design.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

929

Test Equality between Three Treatments under an Incomplete Block Crossover Design.

Kung-Jong Lui1

  • 1a Department of Mathematics and Statistics , San Diego State University , San Diego , California , USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|June 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces statistical methods for comparing two treatments against a placebo in crossover trials. The findings guide the selection of appropriate tests based on treatment effect magnitudes and directions.

Keywords:
Crossover trialIncomplete blockInterval estimationScheffe’s methodTest equality

More Related Videos

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.3K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

929
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.3K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Pharmacometrics

Background:

  • Crossover trials are efficient for comparing treatments using continuous data.
  • Evaluating multiple treatments against a placebo requires robust statistical methodologies.
  • Incomplete block designs introduce complexities in treatment comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate statistical test procedures and interval estimators for comparing two experimental treatments with a placebo.
  • To assess the performance of different statistical approaches under various treatment effect scenarios.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate methods for analyzing incomplete block crossover trials.

Main Methods:

  • Random effects linear additive risk model.
  • Development of three simultaneous test procedures and interval estimators.
  • Monte Carlo simulations for performance evaluation.
  • Application to forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) data from a formoterol trial.

Main Results:

  • The bivariate F-test procedure is preferred when only one treatment differs from the placebo.
  • A summary test procedure using weighted-least-squares (WLS) estimators is powerful when treatment effects are similar.
  • The univariate test with Bonferroni's equality remains useful for large individual treatment effects.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of statistical procedure depends on the specific pattern of treatment effects.
  • The proposed methods offer flexible and powerful tools for analyzing complex crossover trials.
  • The study provides practical guidance for researchers in clinical and pharmaceutical settings.