Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing Context-Appropriate Emotions: Longitudinal Changes in Emotion Reactivity and Emotion Regulation From 6 to 12 Months.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Finding order in chaos: influences of environmental complexity and predictability on development.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2024
Same author

Why behaviour matters: Studying inter-brain coordination during child-caregiver interaction.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2024
Same author

The effect of perinatal interventions on parent anxiety, infant socio-emotional development and parent-infant relationship outcomes: A systematic review.

JCPP advances·2023
Same author

Proactive or reactive? Neural oscillatory insight into the leader-follower dynamics of early infant-caregiver interaction.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Inhibitory deficits and symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: How are they related to effortful control?

The British journal of developmental psychology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

11.7K

Comparing methods for measuring peak look duration: are individual differences observed on screen-based tasks also

Sam V Wass1

  • 1Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.

Infant Behavior & Development
|June 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study examined infant sustained attention measurement techniques. Individual differences in peak look duration were consistent across screen-based methods but not naturalistic ones, questioning real-world applicability.

Keywords:
AttentionInfantNaturalistic attentionPeak look durationSustained attention

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

1.5K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

11.7K
Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

1.5K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Infant Behavior

Background:

  • Sustained attention is crucial for cognitive development in early childhood.
  • Research on infant sustained attention measurement is limited, with few comparisons of different techniques.
  • Understanding measurement stability is key for reliable developmental assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare screen-based and naturalistic methods for measuring infant sustained attention.
  • To assess the stability of individual differences in peak look duration across measurement techniques.
  • To determine if infant attention measures are consistent between laboratory and real-world settings.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed peak look duration in 42 typically developing 11-month-old infants.
  • Utilized six measurement paradigms: four screen-based and two naturalistic.
  • Employed zero-order correlations and factor analysis to compare results.

Main Results:

  • Individual differences in peak look duration were stable across all four screen-based paradigms.
  • No significant correlations were found between screen-based and naturalistic paradigm measures.
  • Factor analysis revealed distinct groupings for screen-based versus naturalistic tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Screen-based measures of infant sustained attention show good internal consistency.
  • Current screen-based paradigms may not fully capture ecologically valid attentional behaviors.
  • Further research is needed to bridge the gap between lab-based and real-world infant attention measures.