Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
Published on: February 29, 2020
Individual differences in perceptions of gay men's sexual role preferences from facial cues
Konstantin O Tskhay1, Daniel E Re, Nicholas O Rule
1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St. George St, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada, konstantin.tskhay@mail.utoronto.ca.
Abstract:
Research has demonstrated that the sexual role preferences of gay men can be perceived with accuracies that exceed chance guessing from viewing photos of their faces. This research was conducted with only heterosexual perceivers making the categorizations. We therefore examined whether men who have sex with men (N = 121) were able to perceive sexual role preferences from faces and, critically, whether perceivers' masculinity, femininity, homonegativity, and own sexual role preference affected their categorizations of targets as "tops" or "bottoms." We found that men who have sex with men, like heterosexual perceivers in prior work, perceived gay men's sexual role preferences accurately. Furthermore, men who self-identified with a receptive (bottom) role were more accurate in their categorizations and male perceivers who self-reported higher levels of masculinity were more likely to categorize other men as bottoms. These findings suggest that men's masculinity could serve as a lens through which people perceive others and interact with the world.
More Related Videos
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Desirable Characteristics in Others
Role of Affect in Interpersonal Attraction
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Surveys