Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

2.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
2.9K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

714
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
714
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

257
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
257
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

6.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
6.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pharmacokinetic studies and synergistic antitumor effects of cannabichromene and cannabidiol in drug-resistant breast cancers.

Drug delivery and translational research·2026
Same author

The NExT trial: Protocol for a two-phase randomized controlled trial testing transcranial magnetic stimulation to augment exposure therapy for youth with OCD.

Trials·2024
Same author

Serological Evidence of Potential Marburg Virus Circulation in Livestock and Dogs in Ghana.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Co-Circulating Monkeypox and Swinepox Viruses, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2022.

Emerging infectious diseases·2024
Same author

Molecular and Pathological Characterization of Classical Swine Fever Virus Genotype 2 Strains Responsible for the 2013-2018 Outbreak in Colombia.

Viruses·2023
Same author

Use of Machine Learning with Temporal Photoluminescence Signals from CdTe Quantum Dots for Temperature Measurement in Microfluidic Devices.

ACS applied nano materials·2021
Same journal

Regularized Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Exploratory Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Capturing Heterogeneity in Levels, Variability, and Couplings across Persons and Time with a Hierarchical Time-Varying Coefficient Formulation of the Multivariate Normal.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

BAYESIAN MIXED MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING FOR AUDITORY PROCESSING.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

7.8K

Bayesian Checks on Cheating on Tests.

Wim J van der Linden1, Charles Lewis

  • 1CTB/McGraw-Hill, 20 Ryan Ranch Road, Monterey, CA, 93940, USA, wim_vanderlinden@ctb.com.

Psychometrika
|June 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Posterior odds offer a better way to detect cheating on achievement tests than traditional statistical methods. This approach allows for incorporating prior evidence of cheating, improving detection accuracy.

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.9K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

7.8K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.9K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Current methods for detecting cheating on achievement tests rely on statistical hypothesis testing, often using p-values.
  • Existing statistical tests for answer copying present limitations, including arbitrary choices in conditioning on suspected copied responses.
  • There is a need for a more flexible and informative approach to quantify the evidence of cheating.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce posterior odds as a superior alternative to p-values for statistical hypothesis testing in cheating detection.
  • To demonstrate a method for calculating the combinatorial expressions of posterior odds using a reformulated recursive algorithm.
  • To show how posterior odds can incorporate prior evidence of cheating, enhancing the detection process.

Main Methods:

  • Reformulation of the recursive algorithm for calculating number-correct score distributions.
  • Calculation of combinatorial expressions for posterior odds.
  • Comparison of posterior odds with traditional p-value approaches in cheating detection models.

Main Results:

  • Posterior odds provide a direct measure of the likelihood of cheating, overcoming limitations of p-values.
  • The proposed method allows for the incorporation of prior odds, reflecting existing circumstantial evidence of cheating.
  • This approach resolves the arbitrary choice between statistical tests that do and do not condition on suspected copied responses.

Conclusions:

  • Posterior odds represent a more robust and interpretable metric for detecting cheating in achievement testing.
  • The presented calculation method is computationally feasible and integrates seamlessly with existing score distribution algorithms.
  • Utilizing posterior odds enhances the ability of testing agencies to make informed decisions regarding suspected academic dishonesty.