Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

41.0K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
41.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Talker Sex Differences on Binaural Summation in Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Binaural Processing Is Key to Tonal-Language Benefits and Right-Ear Advantage for Segregation of Competing Speech.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Factors affecting binaural fusion in cochlear implant users.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Implicit and Explicit Voice Training Effects on Speech-on-Speech Perception and Listening Effort.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Targeted inner ear delivery of gadolinium using microbubble-assisted ultrasound in an ovine model.

International journal of pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Music Ensemble: a large dataset on musicianship, cognition, and personality in musicians and nonmusicians.

Scientific data·2026
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.1K

Single- and multi-channel modulation detection in cochlear implant users.

John J Galvin1, Sandy Oba2, Qian-Jie Fu2

  • 1Division of Communication and Auditory Neuroscience, House Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|June 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Single-channel measures may overestimate cochlear implant (CI) users' multichannel modulation sensitivity. CI users integrate information across channels rather than relying on the best single channel for improved performance.

More Related Videos

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.1K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing in Hearing
  • Cochlear Implant Technology

Background:

  • Single-channel modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) correlate with cochlear implant (CI) speech performance.
  • Multichannel modulation sensitivity in CI users is not well understood.
  • Potential factors influencing multichannel sensitivity include loudness summation and variations in single-channel MDTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate multichannel modulation sensitivity in CI users.
  • To determine the influence of loudness summation and across-site variance on multichannel MDTs.
  • To compare single-channel and multichannel MDTs under different loudness conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Measured single- and multichannel MDTs in 9 CI users.
  • Tested at low and high presentation levels and modulation frequencies.
  • Acquired multichannel MDTs with and without loudness compensation.

Main Results:

  • Presentation level and modulation frequency effects were similar for single- and multichannel MDTs.
  • Multichannel MDTs were worse than single-channel MDTs at equal loudness, suggesting overestimation by single-channel measures.
  • Multichannel MDTs were better than the best single-channel MDT when loudness was not compensated.

Conclusions:

  • Single-channel MDTs may overestimate CI users' multichannel modulation sensitivity at equal loudness.
  • CI users appear to integrate envelope information across channels, not just attend to the best channel.
  • Across-site variance in single-channel MDTs did not correlate with the multichannel advantage.