Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.6K
P-value01:10

P-value

7.1K
P-value is one of the most crucial concepts in statistics.
P-value stands for the probability value.  P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to  not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more...
7.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.4K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

6.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
6.0K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

2.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Commentary on "Shaping the future of clinical trials through strategic foresight".

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Why "Minimal Clinically Important Difference" for Interpreting the Magnitude of the Treatment Effect Is Not Useful.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2025
Same author

A new way to address missing data in late-stage clinical trials.

Contemporary clinical trials·2024
Same author

Variable Duration Trial as an Alternative Design for Continuous Endpoints.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Challenges and strategies for clinical trials in propionic and methylmalonic acidemias.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2023
Same author

Study design challenges and strategies in clinical trials for rare diseases: Lessons learned from pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.

Frontiers in neurology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
09:32

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells

Published on: February 8, 2018

14.6K

The potential for increased power from combining P-values testing the same hypothesis.

Jitendra Ganju1, Guoguang Julie Ma1

  • 1Gilead Sciences, Foster City, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|June 13, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Combining multiple p-values from various test statistics offers a more powerful approach to hypothesis testing than relying on a single statistic. This method enhances statistical inference, especially when the optimal test is unknown.

Keywords:
clinical trialsincrease powermultiple testingpermutation testsrandomization

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
10:20

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

4.3K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
09:32

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells

Published on: February 8, 2018

14.6K
Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
10:20

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

4.3K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Hypothesis Testing

Background:

  • Traditional hypothesis testing uses a single, prespecified test statistic.
  • Identifying the single most powerful test statistic is often challenging.
  • Multiple relevant test statistics may exist for evaluating treatment effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a method for combining p-values from multiple test statistics for enhanced statistical inference.
  • To demonstrate the increased power of combined p-value approaches compared to single test statistics.
  • To explore the applicability of this method in scenarios with more covariates than observations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing randomization-based tests to combine p-values from multiple prespecified test statistics.
  • Comparing the power of combined p-value methods (e.g., Fisher's combination, minimum p-value) against single test statistics and Simes's method.
  • Investigating the method's performance when the number of covariates exceeds the number of observations.

Main Results:

  • Combining p-values from multiple test statistics significantly increases statistical power compared to using a single test.
  • The proposed method demonstrates remarkable power gains.
  • The approach is versatile and applicable even when the number of covariates is greater than the number of observations.

Conclusions:

  • Combining p-values from multiple test statistics provides a more powerful and flexible approach to hypothesis testing.
  • This method is preferable to relying on a single p-value due to substantial power increases.
  • Limitations include the lack of an unbiased treatment effect estimator and inapplicability to models with treatment-by-covariate interactions.