Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing
Published on: September 25, 2011
Strategies for screening for colorectal carcinoma
W L England1, J J Halls, V B Hunt
1Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
For average-risk individuals, screening for colorectal cancer using a fecal occult blood test followed by a double-contrast barium enema and possibly colonoscopy is most cost-effective. Higher-risk groups may benefit from direct colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Public Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is crucial for early detection and improved patient outcomes.
- Various screening tests and strategies exist, each with different cost-effectiveness profiles.
- Identifying the most economically viable screening approach is essential for resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
- To compare thirteen combinations of commonly used CRC detection tests.
- To determine optimal screening pathways for average-risk and higher-risk populations.
Main Methods:
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of four CRC screening tests and thirteen combinations.
- Modeling of diagnostic costs and years of extended life.
- Sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of findings regarding test costs, sensitivity, and specificity.
Main Results:
- The most cost-effective strategy for average-risk individuals involves a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) followed by a double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) and, if needed, colonoscopy.
- For higher-risk individuals or populations with high adenomatous polyp frequency, a positive FOBT followed directly by colonoscopy is a cost-effective alternative.
- The frequency of adenomatous polyps significantly impacts diagnostic costs, while cancer frequency influences the cost per year of extended life.
Conclusions:
- The recommended FOBT-DCBE-colonoscopy strategy offers superior cost-effectiveness for average-risk CRC screening.
- Direct colonoscopy after FOBT is a viable and cost-effective alternative for specific higher-risk groups.
- These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing CRC screening program resource allocation and effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

