Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Predictive ability of bleeding risk scores in the routine clinical practice
Albert Ariza-Solé1, Joel Salazar-Mendiguchía2, Victòria Lorente2
1Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain aariza@bellvitgehospital.cat.
Background:
Previous predictive models of bleeding in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) used different definitions of bleeding and some of them come from populations lacking important predictors of haemorrhagic complications. Our group previously developed a predictive model of bleeding (PMB), including clinically meaningful variables, providing an optimal predictive ability. We aimed to compare the ability of this PMB with the main available bleeding risk scores for predicting major bleeding according to different definitions in non-selected ACS patients from daily clinical practice.
Methods:
All ACS patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit were prospectively included. CRUSADE, Mehran and ACTION bleeding risk scores were calculated for each patient. In-hospital bleeding was recorded using the CRUSADE, TIMI, Mehran, ACTION and BARC definitions. For reasons of clinical relevance, BARC 3 and 5 categories were considered severe BARC bleeding for this study. The predictive ability of the PMB and other bleeding risk scores was assessed by binary logistic regression, ROC curves and areas under the curves (AUCs).
Results:
We included 1976 patients. Mean age was 62.1 years. Almost all patients underwent angiography, 65% of them by the radial approach. The incidence of major bleeding was: CRUSADE bleeding 3.9% (77/1976); Mehran bleeding 4.8% (94/1976); ACTION bleeding 3.9% (78/1976); and BARC 3/5 bleeding 2.4% (48/1976). The PMB showed the best ability for predicting major bleeding regardless of the definition used. The differences were specially significant for predicting BARC 3/5 bleeding (AUC: PMB 0.87, Mehran score 0.68, CRUSADE score 0.70 and ACTION score 0.70). The predictive ability of CRUSADE, ACTION and Mehran scores was similar for all the definitions analysed.
Conclusions:
Current bleeding risk scores showed a similar predictive ability for major bleeding regardless of the definitions used. Including other clinically meaningful predictors of bleeding into the new PMB significantly improved its predictive ability in the clinical scenario of ACS.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
