Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

11:16
A Novel Procedure for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Tastants in Laboratory Rats: Operant Intraoral Self-administration
Published on: February 6, 2014
12.0K
Failure to find positive key-press contrast for milk reinforcers using a within-session procedure
1Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Behavioural Processes
|June 14, 2014
Summary
Rats did not show positive contrast in key pressing behavior across various reinforcement schedules. This suggests different response mechanisms may underlie behavioral contrast in different species.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral psychology
- Animal behavior studies
- Operant conditioning research
Background:
- Behavioral contrast is a phenomenon where response rates change based on the reinforcement schedule of an alternative response.
- Previous studies, primarily with pigeons, have observed positive contrast under specific conditions.
- Understanding the mechanisms of behavioral contrast is crucial for behavioral psychology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate positive contrast in rats responding for sweetened condensed milk under multiple schedules.
- To examine the effect of varying component durations on positive contrast.
- To compare findings in rats with previous research in pigeons.
Main Methods:
- Rats were trained to press keys for sweetened condensed milk rewards.
- Multiple schedules of reinforcement were employed, with component durations ranging from 5 seconds to 16 minutes.
- Response rates during a variable interval component were compared when the other component was extinction versus an identical variable interval schedule.
Main Results:
- Positive contrast was not observed in rats for any tested component duration.
- The relationship between key pressing rate and component duration in rats differed from findings in pigeons.
- Response rates during variable interval schedules did not increase when paired with extinction compared to when paired with another variable interval schedule.
Conclusions:
- The absence of positive contrast in rats suggests that behavioral contrast mechanisms may differ across species or response types.
- Functional differences observed imply that response rate or body part utilization do not solely explain past discrepancies in contrast findings.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms mediating behavioral contrast in different behavioral contexts.

