Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.3K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.9K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Reconstructive Pelvic Anatomy classification system : a valid and reliable classification system for pelvic reconstruction.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Responsible preoperative opioid use for hip or knee arthroplasty (OpioidHALT): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial of pharmacist-partnered opioid tapering prior to hip or knee arthroplasty.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: How Can the Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Data by Orthopaedic Surgeons Be Improved? A National Qualitative Study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same author

Robotic-assisted surgery and functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty: the RASKAL registry-nested 2 × 2 factorial randomized trial.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Behavioural nudges to reduce low-value care for low back pain in the emergency department (NUDG-ED): a 2 × 2 factorial, pragmatic cluster randomized trial.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2026
Same author

Co-Designing the Early Pain Intervention After Knee Replacement (EPIK) Model of Care for People With Persistent Pain After Knee Replacement.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

3.5K

Randomised trial support for orthopaedic surgical procedures.

Hyeung C Lim1, Sam Adie2, Justine M Naylor3

  • 1Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.

Plos One
|June 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Evidence supporting surgical interventions in orthopaedics is limited. Few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate surgery

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

4.2K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

3.5K
Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

4.2K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Orthopaedic procedures are frequently performed.
  • The evidence base supporting surgical interventions requires evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the proportion of orthopaedic procedures supported by high-quality evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
  • To assess the level of evidence comparing operative versus non-operative treatments in orthopaedics.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of orthopaedic procedure volumes from 2009-2011 at three teaching hospitals.
  • Searches of Cochrane databases (CENTRAL, CDSR, DARE) for RCTs on common orthopaedic procedures.
  • Categorization of RCTs as supportive or non-supportive of operative intervention.
  • Risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.

Main Results:

  • Of 8,886 common orthopaedic procedures analyzed, only 22.9% of identified RCTs supported operative intervention.
  • 36.9% of procedures had at least one RCT showing surgery superiority.
  • Only 19.6% of procedures were supported by low risk of bias RCTs favoring surgery.

Conclusions:

  • The evidence base supporting common orthopaedic procedures, particularly from high-quality RCTs, is limited.
  • The level of RCT support in orthopaedics is lower compared to other medical fields.
  • Further high-quality research is needed to guide orthopaedic surgical decision-making.