Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

6.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
6.7K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

800
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
800
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

15.4K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.4K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.1K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disinformation elicits learning biases.

eLife·2026
Same author

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same author

Beliefs about perception shape perceptual inference: An ideal observer model of detection.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Noradrenergic and Dopaminergic modulation of meta-cognition and meta-control.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Latent mechanisms of language disorganization relate to specific dimensions of psychopathology.

Nature. Mental health·2024
Same author

Decomposing dynamical subprocesses for compositional generalization.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.2K

Optimal decision making in heterogeneous and biased environments.

Rani Moran1

  • 1School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, POB 39040, Tel-Aviv, 69978, Israel, rani.moran@gmail.com.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|June 15, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Optimal decision-making in complex environments requires dynamic adjustments to evidence accumulation thresholds. Standard models like the drift diffusion model (DDM) are suboptimal in heterogeneous conditions, necessitating a dynamic bias for optimal performance.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

5.2K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Decision theory

Background:

  • Optimal performance in speeded two-choice tasks is crucial for decision-making theories.
  • The sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) and drift diffusion model (DDM) guide optimality in homogeneous environments.
  • Prior integration bias accommodates environmental biases in current models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate optimal decision-making strategies in difficulty-heterogeneous environments.
  • To evaluate the equivalence and optimality of SPRT and DDM in biased and heterogeneous settings.
  • To determine necessary components for optimal performance within the DDM framework.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of decision-making models.
  • Comparison of SPRT and DDM in heterogeneous environments.
  • Modeling optimal evidence accumulation with dynamic threshold adjustments.

Main Results:

  • SPRT and DDM are suboptimal in difficulty-heterogeneous environments.
  • Optimal performance requires dynamic adjustment of choice thresholds during evidence accumulation.
  • Optimal decision-making in biased environments necessitates both prior and dynamic bias components within the DDM.

Conclusions:

  • Standard DDM and SPRT are insufficient for optimal performance in heterogeneous environments.
  • Dynamic bias adjustment is critical for achieving optimality under environmental complexity.
  • Findings support dynamic bias as essential for optimal decision-making, challenging alternative theories.