Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does prior percutaneous coronary revascularization negatively affect the outcomes of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting?

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Sex-Related Outcome After Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With Perceval Plus: Results From a Global Registry and Meta-Regression.

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

FOOPAS Study: Functional Assessment and Prognostic Value in Aortic Valve Replacement for Patients ≥ 75 Years.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Microinvasive, off-pump, transventricular neochordae implantation in recurrent mitral valve regurgitation after open heart surgical repair.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

Impact of a Clinical Valve Coordinator on Hospital Length of Stay and Patient Outcomes: Results From the BENCHMARK Registry.

Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team·2026
Same author

A difference that matters: the aortic root anatomy of large animal models vs. humans.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
14:14

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement

Published on: December 11, 2017

13.3K

Better short-term outcome by using sutureless valves: a propensity-matched score analysis.

Francesco Pollari1, Giuseppe Santarpino1, Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila2

  • 1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität, Nuremberg, Germany.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|June 15, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Sutureless aortic valve replacement significantly reduces operative times, leading to better patient outcomes and approximately 25% lower hospital costs compared to stented valves. This approach improves recovery and reduces complications.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiac Procedure Testing Prior to Embarking on Large Animal Studies
06:56

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiac Procedure Testing Prior to Embarking on Large Animal Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.7K
Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
08:12

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels

Published on: May 26, 2023

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
14:14

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement

Published on: December 11, 2017

13.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiac Procedure Testing Prior to Embarking on Large Animal Studies
06:56

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiac Procedure Testing Prior to Embarking on Large Animal Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.7K
Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
08:12

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels

Published on: May 26, 2023

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Medical Devices
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Sutureless aortic valve prostheses offer potential for reduced ischemic time during aortic valve replacement.
  • The impact of shorter operative times on patient outcomes and hospital costs requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare clinical outcomes and hospital costs between sutureless and stented aortic valve replacement procedures.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of sutureless valves in reducing operative time and improving patient recovery.

Main Methods:

  • A propensity-score analysis matched 82 pairs of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with either sutureless (n=166) or stented (n=400) valves.
  • Hospital outcomes, follow-up data, and healthcare resource consumption were compared between the two groups.

Main Results:

  • Sutureless valves significantly reduced aortic cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and operation times (p<0.001).
  • Patients receiving sutureless valves experienced shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, reduced intubation times, and lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation, pleural effusions, and respiratory insufficiency.
  • The sutureless group demonstrated a 25% reduction in total hospital costs, driven by decreased resource consumption in diagnostics, operating room, and hospital stay.

Conclusions:

  • Shorter procedural times associated with sutureless aortic valve replacement correlate with improved clinical outcomes.
  • Sutureless aortic valve prostheses lead to significant reductions in hospital costs and resource utilization.