Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: October 24, 2020
A structured, parsimonious approach to establish the cause of moderate-to-large pericardial effusion
Vikram Agarwal1, Georges El Hayek1, Patricia Chavez1
1Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Insights
A structured diagnostic approach helps identify the cause of moderate-to-large pericardial effusion. This method successfully determined the etiology in most patients, guiding treatment decisions for pericardial effusion.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Pericardial effusion diagnosis requires evaluating hemodynamic impact and etiology.
- A systematic diagnostic strategy for pericardial effusion is necessary.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of a structured, stepwise approach in diagnosing the cause of moderate-to-large pericardial effusion.
- To determine the diagnostic yield of noninvasive testing in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 103 patients with moderate-to-large pericardial effusion.
- Application of a stepwise, parsimonious approach for etiological diagnosis.
- Chart review for diagnosis confirmation and data collection.
Main Results:
- The cause of pericardial effusion was identified in 68% of patients using the structured approach and noninvasive testing.
- Malignant pericardial effusion was diagnosed in 19% of cases, all with prior malignancy history or suggestive findings.
- 63% of patients underwent pericardial effusion drainage or sampling.
Conclusions:
- A structured diagnostic approach is effective for determining the cause of moderate-to-large pericardial effusion.
- This strategy aids in guiding the necessity for pericardial drainage or sampling.
- Noninvasive targeted testing is valuable in the etiological workup of pericardial effusion.
Abstract:
The workup of moderate-to-large pericardial effusion should focus on its hemodynamic impact and potential cause. A structured approach to diagnostic evaluation of pericardial effusion is needed. We retrospectively studied a contemporary cohort of 103 patients with moderate-to-large pericardial effusion hospitalized at St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center from July 2009 till August 2013. Diagnosis of pericardial effusion was independently ascertained by chart review. We applied a stepwise parsimonious approach to establish the cause of pericardial effusion. In the studied cohort, the mean age was 61 years, 50% were men, and 65 patients (63%) underwent pericardial effusion drainage. Using the structured approach, the cause of the effusion was ascertained in 70 patients (68%) by noninvasive targeted testing. Malignant effusion was confirmed in 19 patients (19%). All patients with malignant effusion had either history of malignancy or suggestive noninvasive findings. In conclusion, a structured approach can help to ascertain the diagnosis in patients with moderate-to-large pericardial effusion and guide the need for pericardial drainage or sampling.
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

