Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

2.9K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
2.9K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

5.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.8K
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

11.5K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
11.5K
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

16.6K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
16.6K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

11.5K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
11.5K
Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

833
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
833

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequence-Based Synteny Analysis of Multiple Large Genomes.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2017
Same author

New Genome Similarity Measures based on Conserved Gene Adjacencies.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2017
Same author

NEMo: An Evolutionary Model With Modularity for PPI Networks.

IEEE transactions on nanobioscience·2017
Same author

On Computing Breakpoint Distances for Genomes with Duplicate Genes.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2016
Same author

A Fast and Exact Algorithm for the Exemplar Breakpoint Distance.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2016
Same author

A maximum-likelihood approach for building cell-type trees by lifting.

BMC genomics·2016
Same journal

3DICE: Interpretable 3D Cross-Modal Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Large-Scale Drug Discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

KASSPer: Kinase Active Site Structure Prediction using Protein and Ligand Language Models and Its Application to Virtual Screening.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

IDR searcher: a search engine solution for public image resources.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

KCFtools: Rapid alignment-free method for introgression screening and GWAS using k-mer profiles.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Meta2DB: Curated shotgun metagenomic feature sets and metadata for health state prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

conMItion: an R package adjusting confounding factors for associations in multi-omics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K

Evaluating synteny for improved comparative studies.

Cristina G Ghiurcuta1, Bernard M E Moret1

  • 1Laboratory for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, EPFL-IC-LCBB INJ 230, Station 14, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|June 17, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparative genomics tools for identifying syntenic blocks produce inconsistent results. This study introduces a new model and quality criterion to systematically evaluate and improve these essential comparative genomics tools.

More Related Videos

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

3.1K
Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays
14:06

Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays

Published on: November 12, 2012

46.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.1K
An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

3.1K
Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays
14:06

Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays

Published on: November 12, 2012

46.1K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Comparative genomics utilizes syntenic blocks for genome analysis, enabling large-scale comparisons and identification of conserved regions.
  • Current methods for identifying syntenic blocks lack a standardized definition and produce inconsistent results, hindering systematic analysis.
  • Existing tools for syntenic block identification cannot be objectively benchmarked due to a lack of measurable quality objectives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the inconsistencies in syntenic block identification by developing a theoretical model and experimental basis for comparison.
  • To introduce a quality criterion for evaluating syntenic blocks based on evolutionary principles.
  • To assess the performance of current syntenic block identification tools and highlight the need for a more robust approach.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a theoretical model and experimental framework for comparing syntenic blocks.
  • Applied the model and measures to syntenic blocks generated by three distinct tools: DRIMM-Synteny, i-ADHoRe, and Cyntenator.
  • Utilized a dataset comprising eight yeast genomes for experimental validation.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated significant divergence in syntenic block identification results across the evaluated tools.
  • Highlighted the variability and potential lack of robustness in current comparative genomics approaches.
  • Provided a foundational quality criterion for the systematic construction of syntenic blocks.

Conclusions:

  • A well-founded, systematic approach to genome decomposition into syntenic blocks is crucial for reliable comparative genomics.
  • The developed model and quality criterion offer a path towards improved and standardized syntenic block identification.
  • Further development is needed to enhance the robustness and consistency of tools used in comparative genomics research.