Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Specialized testing after recent acute myocardial infarction.

R F DeBusk1

  • 1Stanford University School of Medicine, California.

Annals of Internal Medicine
|March 15, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Specialized tests after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) help predict patient risk. Integrating these tests into guidelines aids clinicians in managing patients with heart attack recovery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exercise Testing Update.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Optimal use of spironolactone for treatment of heart failure.

Congestive heart failure (Greenwich, Conn.)·2002
Same author

Disease management systems for chronic cardiovascular diseases: focus on heart failure.

Advances in internal medicine·2001
Same author

Evaluating the cardiovascular tolerance for sex.

The American journal of cardiology·2000
Same author

The role of the health care system in primordial prevention.

Preventive medicine·2000
Same author

Chronic disease management: treating the patient with disease(s) vs treating disease(s) in the patient.

Archives of internal medicine·1999

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Medicine
  • Diagnostic Testing

Background:

  • Specialized laboratory tests are used to assess prognosis and functional capacity post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
  • Limited integration of these test data into clinical guidelines hinders optimal patient management.
  • Quantifying myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction are key objectives for prognosis after AMI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the utility of specialized laboratory tests for characterizing prognosis and functional capacity after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
  • To evaluate the use of these tests, individually and in combination, during AMI recovery.
  • To provide a framework for selecting appropriate tests based on clinical information, risk, quality, and cost.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of specialized laboratory tests used in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recovery.
  • Analysis of test performance in quantifying myocardial ischemia and left ventricular dysfunction.
  • Evaluation of the stepwise application of testing to stratify patients into risk groups.

Main Results:

  • Specialized testing identifies three patient risk groups post-AMI: very high risk (20%, primarily left ventricular dysfunction), moderately high risk (30%, primarily myocardial ischemia), and low risk (50%, minimal dysfunction or ischemia).
  • Accurate risk stratification enables tailored medical and surgical therapies for moderate-to-high risk patients and accelerated recovery for low-risk patients.
  • Testing guides post-thrombolysis and revascularization management.

Conclusions:

  • Stepwise specialized testing is crucial for risk stratification and guiding management after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
  • This approach optimizes treatment strategies, improving outcomes for diverse patient populations.
  • The integration of these tests into clinical practice enhances the management of AMI recovery.

Related Experiment Videos