Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Focus on Standardized Salivary Gland Ultrasound Protocol in Connective Tissue Disease Research
Published on: October 13, 2023
A comparison of parotid imaging characteristics and sialendoscopic findings in obstructive salivary disorders
Ruwan Kiringoda1, David W Eisele, Jolie L Chang
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
Objectives/Hypothesis:
To examine how preoperative imaging characteristics correlate with sialendoscopic findings and operative outcomes in patients with obstructive parotid symptoms.
Study Design:
Retrospective review.
Methods:
We identified 112 consecutive patients who underwent 134 unilateral or bilateral parotid gland sialendoscopies between December 2005 and August 2013. We reviewed clinical history, radiographic imaging and reports, operative reports, and clinical outcomes. Available preoperative computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were analyzed for parotid stone size and location relative to the masseter muscle.
Results:
For patients with parotid stone on preoperative imaging, at least one stone was found on sialendoscopy in 63% of cases. In contrast, for all cases with preoperative imaging negative for stone, no stone was found on sialendoscopy suggesting that parotid stones are not radiolucent on CT imaging. Furthermore, stones located anterior to the masseter were more successfully visualized on sialendoscopy compared to stones located posterior to the masseter. Anteriorly located stones were also more accessible for endoscopic management, whereas posterior stones required combined approaches for management.
Conclusions:
Preoperative imaging characteristics such as stone presence, size, and location provide essential information that can guide surgical planning and clinical outcome expectations for obstructive parotid disease management. All parotid CT scans that failed to demonstrate stones on imaging had no stone found on sialendoscopy. Stones posterior to the masseter muscle are the most difficult to access with sialendoscopy, and in these cases, patients should be counseled about the potential need for a transfacial approach to remove symptomatic stones.
Level Of Evidence:
2b.

