Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mandibular Arch Morphology in Normodivergent Patients With Impacted Maxillary Canines: A Case-Control Study.

International journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Occlusal force analysis with T-Scan and Innobyte in adult patients: a prospective study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Comparative Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Fixed Systems in Treating Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Occlusal Force Changes in Growing Patients Treated with the Three Bite Plane Appliance: A Prospective Study.

Dentistry journal·2026
Same author

Short-term morphological changes of vacuum-formed retainers with different gingival margin designs: a randomized clinical trial.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same author

The Accuracy of Maxillary Canines' Rotation with Different Attachment Designs: A Retrospective Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.1K

A comparative study of two different clear aligner systems.

Federica Ercoli1, Michele Tepedino, Vincenzo Parziale

  • 1Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Ospedale S, Salvatore, 6, Coppito L'Aquila 67100, Italy. federica.ercoli@gmail.com.

Progress in Orthodontics
|June 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary

The Nuvola® and Fantasmino® aligner systems both achieved treatment goals, though Nuvola® improved patient compliance due to its size, while Fantasmino® offered superior elastic properties. Both systems faced challenges with torque and rotation correction.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol
04:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.5K
Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
07:14

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities

Published on: May 24, 2022

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.1K
Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol
04:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into an Efficient Murine Maxillary Orthodontic Model Protocol

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.5K
Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
07:14

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities

Published on: May 24, 2022

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Biomaterials

Background:

  • Comparison of Nuvola® and Fantasmino® aligner systems.
  • Evaluation of material properties and clinical indications for aligners.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and patient compliance of Nuvola® and Fantasmino® aligner systems.
  • To define specific indications for the use of each aligner system based on their performance.

Main Methods:

  • Two patient groups were selected for the study.
  • One group was treated with the Nuvola® aligner system, and the other with the Fantasmino® system.

Main Results:

  • Both the Nuvola® and Fantasmino® systems successfully achieved the intended treatment goals.
  • The Nuvola® system demonstrated better patient collaboration due to its size, facilitating consistent wear.
  • The Fantasmino® system exhibited high-performance elastic properties, but its larger size impacted daily compliance.

Conclusions:

  • While both systems are effective, Nuvola® offers advantages in patient compliance.
  • Fantasmino® excels in material elasticity but may present challenges with patient adherence.
  • Both aligner systems encountered difficulties in correcting torque and rotational issues.