Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

No One Likes a Snitch.

Barbara Redman1, Arthur Caplan

  • 1Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA, bkredman@comcast.net.

Science and Engineering Ethics
|June 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"I Feel Good": The Many Flaws of the Wellness Movement.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

The Epstein scandal is a wake-up call - new rules are needed on links with rich donors.

Nature·2026
Same author

The Executive Order on "Crime and Disorder": An Affront to Policy, Law, and Ethics.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

The United States platelet shortage: Whole blood derived platelets or paying donors.

Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis·2026
Same author

Is concurrent gestational surrogacy an ethical practice?

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same author

The Myth of the Designer Baby : Parents beware of any genomics firm saying it can help them with "genetic optimization" of their embryos.

Scientific American·2025
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Whistleblowers are crucial for reporting research misconduct but lack adequate protection, deterring essential reporting. Strengthening legal protections and organizational accountability is vital to ensure fair treatment and combat research fraud.

Area of Science:

  • Research integrity and ethics
  • Scientific misconduct and fraud

Background:

  • Whistleblowers are vital for identifying research misconduct.
  • Current protections for whistleblowers are insufficient, leading to fear of retribution.
  • Existing whistleblower protection regulations have not been finalized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical role of whistleblowers in research misconduct allegations.
  • To advocate for enhanced whistleblower protections and organizational accountability.
  • To propose actionable steps to address research fraud and protect whistleblowers.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing challenges faced by whistleblowers.
  • Analysis of the impact of inadequate protection on reporting misconduct.
  • Proposal of policy recommendations and legal reforms.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Whistleblowers are essential but poorly protected, hindering the reporting of research misconduct.
  • Lack of timely regulatory action on whistleblower protection.
  • Research fraud poses a growing challenge.

Conclusions:

  • Strengthened legal protections against retaliation are urgently needed.
  • Organizations must take responsibility for research accuracy through audits.
  • Mandatory whistleblower action for imminent harm and consideration of criminalization for severe misconduct are recommended.