Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Biochemical Titration of Glycogen In vitro
Published on: November 24, 2013
1,5-Anhydroglucitol and glycated albumin in glycemia
Abstract:
The main purpose of treating diabetes is to prevent the onset and the progression of diabetic chronic complications. Since the mechanism of onset of chronic complications is still not well understood, the main strategy to achieve this purpose is to bring the plasma glucose level in diabetic patients as close as possible to that in healthy subjects and try to maintain good glycemic control over the long term. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glycated albumin (GA), fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5 AG) are used for evaluating glycemic control. At present, HbA1c is widely used as a gold standard index for glycemic control in clinical practice. While HbA1c reflects the long-term glycemic control state (for the past 1-2 months), it does not accurately reflect glycemic control in the clinical state in which glycemic control improves or deteriorates in the short-term. It is also known that HbA1c in patients with hematological disorders such as anemia and variant hemoglobin shows an abnormal value. In addition, HbA1c mainly reflects the mean plasma glucose but does not reflect the postprandial plasma glucose. On the other hand, GA and 1,5-AG reflect intermediate- or short-term glycemic control and are not influenced by hemoglobin metabolism. While 1,5-AG is known to reflect the postprandial plasma glucose, it was shown recently that GA also reflects the postprandial plasma glucose. This chapter summarizes the measurement methods, usage methods, evidence, and problems concerning such indices for glycemic control.
Insights
Monitoring diabetes involves various blood glucose tests like HbA1c, glycated albumin (GA), and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5 AG). While HbA1c is standard, GA and 1,5 AG offer better short-term and post-meal glucose insights.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Diabetes Management
Background:
- Diabetic chronic complications necessitate stringent glycemic control.
- Current strategies focus on maintaining plasma glucose levels close to normal.
- Understanding glycemic control indices is crucial for effective diabetes treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review measurement, usage, evidence, and limitations of glycemic control indices.
- To compare HbA1c with other markers like glycated albumin (GA) and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5 AG).
- To highlight the importance of selecting appropriate glycemic markers for diabetes management.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on glycemic control markers.
- Analysis of measurement techniques and clinical applications.
- Comparison of HbA1c, GA, fructosamine, and 1,5 AG.
Main Results:
- HbA1c reflects long-term control but has limitations in short-term changes and specific patient groups (e.g., anemia).
- GA and 1,5 AG offer insights into intermediate- and short-term glycemic control.
- Both GA and 1,5 AG are not affected by hemoglobin metabolism and reflect postprandial glucose levels.
Conclusions:
- HbA1c is the gold standard but has limitations.
- GA and 1,5 AG provide valuable complementary information for glycemic monitoring.
- Appropriate selection of glycemic control indices is essential for optimal diabetes care.
More Related Videos
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
10:35Extracellular Glucose Depletion as an Indirect Measure of Glucose Uptake in Cells and Tissues Ex Vivo
Published on: April 6, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Hyperglycemia
Hormones Regulating Blood Glucose
In addition to accelerating glucose uptake and utilization, insulin has...
Hypoglycemia
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Diabetic Nephropathy
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...