Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Structural reinforcement and sealing ability of temporary fillings in premolar with class II mod cavities
Yuri Dal Bello1, João Vicente Barbizam2, Vinicius Rosa3
1Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, University of Passo Fundo-Faculty of Dentistry, RS, Brazil.
Aim:
To evaluate the capability to reinforce tooth structure and sealing ability of temporary filling materials in premolars with MOD cavities. The hypothesis is that temporary filling materials can concomitantly prevent microleakage and increase fracture resistance.
Materials And Methods:
Premolars received root canal treatment and MOD cavities. Cavities were restored with non- eugenol cement (CIM), glass ionomer cement (GIC) or light curable composite (BIO). Higid and without restoration were controls. Materials for flexual strength and teeth were tested for microleakage and compressive strength.
Results:
GIC and Higid presented similar compressive strength, higher than other groups. Bio and GIC presented similar flexural strength higher than BIO. CIM and BIO showed similar micro- leakage lower than GIC.
Conclusion:
The hypothesis was rejected as filling materials tested failed to prevent microleakage and to increase fracture resistance concomitantly.
Clinical Significance:
GIC may be considered to restore weakened teeth subjected to occlusal loads. BIO and CIM are better choices to microleakage in teeth not subjected to mechanical stresses.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Masonry Cavity Walls
Maintaining a clean cavity during construction...
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...

