One-component revision in total hip arthroplasty: the fate of the retained component

Ioannis P Stathopoulos1, Kalliopi I Lampropoulou-Adamidou1, John A Vlamis1

  • 1Third Orthopaedic Department, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Athens, General Hospital of Athens KAT, Greece.

Insights

Revision of stable one-component total hip arthroplasty parts is not recommended, even after many years. Long duration or radiographic signs of loosening do not justify removing functional acetabular or femoral components.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Arthroplasty Research

Background:

  • One-component total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure.
  • Assessing the long-term viability of retained components during THA revision is crucial for patient outcomes.
  • Previous studies have not fully elucidated the fate of unrevised components in THA revision surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term outcomes of unrevised acetabular and femoral components following one-component THA revision.
  • To determine if factors like component longevity or radiographic appearance warrant revision of stable, unrevised parts.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 46 hips from 44 patients undergoing one-component THA revision.
  • Inclusion of patients with a mean age of 58 years at the time of index operation.
  • Long-term follow-up to assess subsequent revisions of unrevised acetabular and femoral components.

Main Results:

  • Twenty-one percent (4/19) of unrevised acetabular components were later revised at a mean of 14 years post-index operation.
  • Twenty-two percent (6/27) of unrevised femoral components were revised at a mean of 11 years post-index operation.
  • Subsequent revisions occurred at mean times of 22 and 24 years from the primary operation for acetabular and femoral components, respectively.

Conclusions:

  • Revision of a stable, unrevised component in one-component THA is generally not justifiable.
  • Long duration of use or non-ideal positioning alone are insufficient reasons for component revision.
  • Radiographic evidence of possible loosening in stable components should not automatically lead to revision surgery.

Related Concept Videos