Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
New oral anticoagulants may be particularly useful for asian stroke patients
Oh Young Bang1, Keun-Sik Hong2, Ji Hoe Heo3
1Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) offer superior safety and efficacy compared to warfarin for preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, especially in Asian populations. Their cost-effectiveness supports wider adoption to reduce the AF stroke burden.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Public Health
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing global health issue, particularly with an aging population.
- AF-related ischemic stroke is a severe complication, often more debilitating and fatal than other stroke types.
- Warfarin, a traditional anticoagulant, is underused due to bleeding risks and a narrow therapeutic window.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared to warfarin in preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
- To assess the differential benefits of NOACs versus warfarin in Asian versus non-Asian populations.
- To address the cost-effectiveness and policy implications of NOACs for managing AF-related stroke.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of four large phase III randomized controlled trials (RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE-AF-TIMI 48).
- Comparison of efficacy (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism) and safety (intracranial hemorrhage) between NOACs and warfarin.
- Examination of treatment outcomes stratified by ethnicity (Asian vs. non-Asian) and consideration of compliance factors.
Main Results:
- NOACs demonstrated superiority or non-inferiority to warfarin in preventing ischemic stroke and systemic embolism.
- NOACs showed superior safety by reducing intracranial hemorrhage compared to warfarin.
- The benefits of NOACs over warfarin appeared greater in Asian patients, who face higher risks and bleeding complications.
Conclusions:
- NOACs represent a safer and more effective alternative to warfarin for AF patients, particularly for stroke prevention in Asian populations.
- Addressing cost concerns and developing clear reimbursement guidelines are crucial for broader NOAC adoption.
- A collaborative approach between academic societies and regulatory bodies is needed to implement policies reducing the AF-related stroke burden.
Abstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an emerging epidemic in both high-income and low-income countries, mainly because of global population aging. Stroke is a major complication of AF, and AF-related ischemic stroke is more disabling and more fatal than other types of ischemic stroke. However, because of concerns about bleeding complications, particularly intracranial hemorrhage, and the limitations of a narrow therapeutic window, warfarin is underused. Four large phase III randomized controlled trials in patients with non-valvular AF (RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, and ENGAGE-AF-TIMI 48) demonstrated that new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are superior or non-inferior to warfarin as regards their efficacy in preventing ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, and superior to warfarin in terms of intracranial hemorrhage. Among AF patients receiving warfarin, Asians compared to non-Asians are at higher risk of stroke or systemic embolism and are also more prone to develop major bleeding complications, including intracranial hemorrhage. The extra benefit offered by NOACs over warfarin appears to be greater in Asians than in non-Asians. In addition, Asians are less compliant, partly because of the frequent use of herbal remedies. Therefore, NOACs compared to warfarin may be safer and more useful in Asians than in non-Asians, especially in stroke patients. Although the use of NOACs in AF patients is rapidly increasing, guidelines for the insurance reimbursement of NOACs have not been resolved, partly because of insufficient understanding of the benefit of NOACs and partly because of cost concerns. The cost-effectiveness of NOACs has been well demonstrated in the healthcare settings of developed countries, and its magnitude would vary depending on population characteristics as well as treatment cost. Therefore, academic societies and regulatory authorities should work together to formulate a scientific healthcare policy that will effectively reduce the burden of AF-related stroke in this rapidly aging society.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemorrhagic Stroke l: Introduction
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
