Multicenter evaluation of renography with an automated physical phantom

The diversity of the dynamic radionuclide renal imaging (renography) study protocols sets challenges for the overall study quality, therefore raising a need for national quality control. The aim of this study was to encourage the standardization of renography in Finland and to evaluate the development after a previous study performed in 1997.

The new Heikkinen phantom was imaged in each of the 20 participating nuclear medicine laboratories. The results were interpreted in the manner of a regular patient study, and reconstructions and printouts were made according to the clinical routines of each laboratory. Four quantitative parameters were calculated and compared between laboratories. The reports were also assessed in a blind test.

The average error in T(max) values ranged from -5 to 7% (-29 to +18% in 1997), in T(1/2) from 0 to 35% (-43 to +66%), in RCA20 from -20 to +28% (-50 to +82%) and in relative uptake from -3 to 5%. The difference from average in relative uptake ranged from -4 to 5% (-21 to +36%).

The results showed that the errors in T(max) and relative uptake were generally within quite acceptable margins, and the variation in quantitative parameters between laboratories was shown to be smaller than 14 years earlier. The reason might be the use of new software packages as well as increased efforts to improve the quality of the studies.