Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Preclinical Model of Hind Limb Ischemia in Diabetic Rabbits
Published on: June 2, 2019
Clinical effectiveness of gene therapy on critical limb ischemia: a meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled clinical
Yu-Liang Miao1, Wei Wu2, Bao-Wei Li2
1Anesthesia and Operation Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China Department of Anesthesiology, PLA No. 306 Hospital, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
Therapeutic angiogenesis using gene therapy is a novel strategy for the treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI). We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gene therapy for the treatment of CLI with no option of revascularization. Randomized placebo controlled trials of gene therapy on CLI were identified by searching PubMed (from 1990 to October 2013) and EMBASE (from 1990 to October 2013). Five eligible studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Among these studies, a total of 425 patients received gene therapy of either fibroblast growth factor 1 or hepatocyte growth factor, and 365 patients were given placebo. No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups in major amputation or death at 1 year (risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.39; P = .48) and wound healing at 6 months (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.73-3.28; P = .25). Gene therapy had similar occurrence of serious adverse events as control (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.97-1.14; P = .23).
Insights
Gene therapy for critical limb ischemia (CLI) showed no significant improvement in amputation rates, death, or wound healing compared to placebo. Safety profiles were also similar between gene therapy and control groups in this meta-analysis.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Regenerative Medicine
- Gene Therapy
Background:
- Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a severe condition with limited treatment options.
- Therapeutic angiogenesis via gene therapy offers a novel approach for CLI management.
- Revascularization may not be an option for all CLI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gene therapy for treating CLI in patients ineligible for revascularization.
- To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials through a meta-analysis.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed and EMBASE databases (1990-October 2013).
- Inclusion of five randomized placebo-controlled trials involving gene therapy for CLI.
- Meta-analysis of outcomes including major amputation, death, wound healing, and serious adverse events.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were found in major amputation or death at 1 year (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.39).
- Wound healing at 6 months also showed no significant difference between gene therapy and placebo (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.73-3.28).
- The occurrence of serious adverse events was similar in both gene therapy and control groups (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.97-1.14).
Conclusions:
- Current gene therapy strategies, including fibroblast growth factor 1 and hepatocyte growth factor, do not demonstrate significant clinical benefits for CLI patients lacking revascularization options.
- Gene therapy for CLI appears to have a comparable safety profile to placebo.
- Further research may be needed to explore alternative gene therapy approaches or patient selection criteria for CLI treatment.
More Related Videos
07:48Assessing Therapeutic Angiogenesis in a Murine Model of Hindlimb Ischemia
Published on: June 8, 2019
11:13Adenoviral Gene Therapy for Diabetic Keratopathy: Effects on Wound Healing and Stem Cell Marker Expression in Human Organ-cultured Corneas and Limbal Epithelial Cells
Published on: April 7, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Gene Therapy
Gene Therapy