Women in Charnley class C fail to improve in mobility to a higher degree after total hip replacement

Max Gordon1, Paolo Frumento, Olof Sköldenberg

  • 1Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register , Gothenburg.

Acta Orthopaedica
|June 24, 2014
PubMed

Insights

The Charnley classification effectively predicts health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Women in class C showed poorer outcomes, highlighting the need for tailored attention, especially in mobility improvements.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • The Charnley comorbidity classification (Classes A, B, C) predicts health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after total hip replacement (THR).
  • Interactions between Charnley class, sex, and age, and the grouping of classes A and B, remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interactions between Charnley class, sex, and age on HRQoL after THR.
  • To determine if Charnley classes A and B should be grouped.

Main Methods:

  • A nationwide cohort from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (2008-2010) undergoing primary osteoarthritis THR was analyzed.
  • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the EQ-5D index and EQ VAS.
  • Preoperative HRQoL, pain, and prior contralateral hip surgery were used to control for confounding factors.

Main Results:

  • Women in Charnley class C reported poorer EQ-5D outcomes compared to men.
  • This disparity was primarily driven by lower mobility improvement rates in women (40%) versus men (50%).
  • Age did not demonstrate interaction with Charnley class, and the classification performed best without altering its structure.

Conclusions:

  • The self-administered Charnley classification should be utilized in its complete form.
  • Special consideration for women within Charnley class C is warranted, particularly regarding mobility outcomes.
Abstract